Materialistic Worldview

The materialistic view of reality is opposed to the spiritualistic view that reigned throughout Middle Ages, part of Ancient Times, and which still exists today. Both have historical roots, but they are not linked to a single period in history, like the Medieval or the Renaissance worldview, nor to a particular culture, like the Western or the Chinese. Both the spiritualistic and materialistic worldviews are past and contemporary, transversal to many cultures.

They are more typical of one time than another, as well as more clinging to one specific culture than another. They are worldviews in the broadest sense of the term, since they are more comprehensive in both historical time and cultural space. Historically, the Middle Ages was all spiritualistic, while from the Renaissance onward, throughout the Modern and Contemporary Ages, they are more materialistic.

Whether it takes on a theoretical character, in the form of philosophy such as atheism or agnosticism, or a practical character, in the form of capitalist consumerism, self-gratification and the absence of values, materialism is today the philosophy of life or the worldview that governs most people. It clearly governs the world of politics, economics, and health, because money has always been a religion in itself, beyond the world of science, universities, the media, and culture in general.

I once asked someone if he was religious; offended, he replied, "How can I be religious? I'm a scientist." Being materialistic, agnostic, or atheistic, is fashionable nowadays, while being religious is out of fashion and connotes ignorance. Therefore, even the few who are religious, do not present themselves as such in order not to lose friends, jobs, or social position.

To the materialists, who live without meaning since matter does not give meaning to life, one can apply that famous phrase of the Dalai Lama: "They live as if they never had to die, and they die as if they had never lived." In fact, Karl Marx, the ultimate exponent of dialectical and historical atheism, faced the question of death in the same cynical way by saying that death should not concern us, because as long as we exist, it will not exist; when it eventually becomes a reality, we will no longer exist.

In other words, death should not be a cause for concern because we will never coexist with it. The fact is, however, no matter how much we hide it in society, it will show up, when first we lose our parents and our aunts and uncles, then our older siblings…

The Medieval society lived reconciled with death, in harmony with it, and in a quasi-friendship, even going so far as to give it a feminine form, dress it in white, and invite it to a circle dance and play chess to see if one could beat, deceive, or distract it. Contrastingly, the modern and contemporary society is afraid of death, afraid that it will take everything away because death is eternal, so they repress the thought of death, in the same manner the Victorian Puritan society repressed sex.

From Animism to Atheism
From animism to materialism there is a gradual materialization of matter and symbiosis with Man, the thinking being that analyzes and relates to it. In the beginning, everything had a soul, even the most material matter had a soul. In a materialistic world like today's, it is hard for us to think that this was the case in the past; however, without going any further, we all experienced a stage of animism in our childhood when we got hurt by something, we would hit, blame, and call that thing bad, as if it were a living entity.

At the adult level, superstition is a remnant of animism, that is, when one grants spiritual value or power to something that is purely material, such as a key or a horseshoe, this is animism, today called superstition.

Knowing certain material realities, knowing how it works and for what purpose, robbed them of their souls, so they became inanimate and returned to being just matter. However, it was not possible to know certain realities scientifically, or they were not easy to know, or it was not possible to completely know and master them. To these realities they were given the name gods and thus was born the god of war, the goddess of love, the god of time, the god of wine, the god of the sea, etc., and consequently polytheism came into being.

For the sake of simplification or in order to unite various peoples and avoid the quarrels of "my god is greater than your god", which could instigate holy wars or other disputes, man intuited that God must be one Lord and creator of everything and everyone. Thus, monotheism emerged in its absolute form, in Judaism and Islam, and in its trinitarian form, in Christianity.

Finally, when scientific progress allowed man to dominate most realities, he decided to kill God (psychoanalytic concept) in order to put himself in God’s place as superman (Nietzsche). In this dialectic of stealing the soul from the known, man ended up stealing the soul of God himself, affirming as Feuerbach did, that it was not God who created man in his image and likeness, but on the contrary, it was man who created God in his own image and likeness.

As the result, the dialectical or philosophical materialism emerged, then the historical materialism and the communist revolution with Karl Marx, and the atheistic psychoanalysis of Sigmund Freud. Nietzsche declared "God is dead, long live the superman" and after God's burial, came Nietzsche's own nihilism followed by Sartre's Nausea about the banality and emptiness of existence.

Materialistic Ideology
This worldview became prominent during the Enlightenment, but it is as old as Democritus (370 B.C.). The materialistic worldview asserts that there is no spirit, no god, no soul. Nothing that cannot be known through the five senses and reason.

Nothing exists beyond nature that has causal influence or acts on nature itself. There is, therefore, no higher being that created nature and exerts any power over it. There is only material nature and nothing beyond it. Life on Earth arose by itself, when all the right conditions to support life came together by chance, from natural substances, by natural selection for natural purposes.

The supernatural or spiritual is a chimera, it does not exist, it is not observable. If something has no explanation, it is not because it is supernatural, but simply because the human being does not know everything yet; In the future, science may be able to explain it. So, it was and has been in the past: realities that were once seen as gods, today they are completely explainable.

The spiritual world is therefore an illusion (an infantile consolation, as Freud calls it). There is no higher being, we are mere complexes of matter, and when we die, we cease to exist, and the simple elements that make up our body will return to their simplicity as our body disintegrates. Since there is no intrinsic meaning to the universe, people have to create values for themselves. There is no right or wrong, except what society dictates, for purposes of survival and tranquility.

Many do not even create values to guide their lives by, because it is difficult to establish ethics without religion. Materialists are fortunate that more than 90% of humanity believes in the existence of a higher being, the foundation and guarantor of the social structure we have; otherwise, 1% of humanity could not have more wealth than the remaining 99%, as is the case today.

If human beings did not believe in life beyond death, the ultimate foundation of ethics, there would be no army or police powerful enough to contain human anger against injustice.  Napoleon Bonaparte was right when he said that religion is what makes the poor not kill the rich.

If what happens after death is the same for the just and the unjust, then it is difficult to distinguish justice from injustice if both have the same end: nothingness. That is why most materialists drown their sorrows in consumerism. Life is bread and circus, as the Romans said, Tempus fugit, Carpe diem, time escapes us, let us seize the day, or "Die Martha, die with a filled belly ".

The processes of evolution or change are essentially random, they have no predefined objective, because there is no intelligent design, as religious believers believe. Randomness reigns: dinosaurs were not predestined to disappear, if that meteorite that destroyed their habitat had not fallen, they might still be alive today, and humans would never have emerged. Beyond randomness, what exists is a natural selection governed by the law of the fittest or whatever adapts best to the circumstances of an ever-changing environment.

It is this and only this that determines why some living beings survive and others perish. Materialists believe that this unconscious, undirected "selection" process, together with random genetic fluctuations (i.e., mutations), are the keys that explain the origin of the world and the living things as we know them today, ourselves included.

Since there is no intelligent design nor any goal that nature has to fulfill, intelligence itself and what we call spiritual are the result of complex natural and material processes that are possible to know and explain. We do not need God to explain anything in the physical-chemical nature. There is nothing in the universe that is personal, everything is impersonal. The human person is another chimera created by spiritualists, there is nothing in the human person beyond complicated physical-chemical processes.

"Scientific" Analysis of Materialism, Atheism or Agnosticism
It is true that we can neither prove the existence of God nor his non-existence, so both theism and atheism or agnosticism are beliefs. That is, one is faith the other is anti-faith, but both involve faith.

Atheists or agnostics like to pose as scientists, friends of science, rational and enlightened. Science is logical-deductive, like mathematics, or intuitive, like Einstein's theory of relativity.

Atheism or agnosticism is not logical – It makes no sense that human beings are, as Karl Marx says, the moment when nature gained thought or self-consciousness, only to realize our misery, that is, that we come from nothing like everything else and will return to nothing along with the flea, the louse, and the bedbug.

If we gained self-consciousness for this, merely to know that we are the only living beings aware of our misery, we would be better off not being aware like the rest of the living beings. It is like knowing the day and circumstances of our death: I do not think there is a single person who is interested in that information.

Unlike the rest of living things, the awareness that we exist for a while and then cease to exist, instead of being a greatness of evolution is rather like going from a horse to a donkey. Where is the greatness of being aware of our own misery, with no solution to remedy it?

Unlike the rest of the living beings that, living in symbiosis with nature, have no freedom, autonomy or independence from it, human beings have their life in their own hands, they have a certain freedom to do with it as they want. Why this freedom, if no matter what we do, the end will be the same for everyone? On the other hand, having freedom is also taking a risk, in the sense that I can make bad choices and turn my life into hell, something that other living beings cannot do.

In life, living beings are happy, they do not need to work, or to study, or to suffer. We, human beings, can be happy or unhappy in life, but even those who are happy always have relative happiness, because the thought that one day we will cease to exist poisons any joy or pleasure, turning it into sadness and depression.

Atheism or agnosticism is not deductive – If the universe was not expanding, if it were static and not dynamic and constantly changing, like the waters of Heraclitus' river, if it had always been the same, if there had been no changes, no evolution, no revolution, we could deduce that it had always existed, that the universe was the god of itself.

This is what science once thought before the Hubble telescope, located far out in space, showed that galaxies are moving away from each other, which led us to deduce that the universe is expanding. The deductive Big Bang theory that states that galaxies are moving away from each other was formulated by the Belgian Catholic priest Georges Lemaître. According to him, the universe began with a big explosion; in this big explosion time/space and matter/energy were created.

In Nature, ignitions or explosions do not happen spontaneously. Everything happens on a cause/effect basis: there is no cause without effect, no effect without cause, there is no water without thirst, no thirst without water. Or, as the people say, "when the pot is made, the lid is made for it”. Furthermore, we do not observe in nature anything that creates itself; it is therefore more logical to deduce the existence of a creator than to deduce his non-existence.

If the universe did not always exist and then began to exist, then there was a "time" when it did not exist at all. And there will be a time when it will cease to exist. Only the Bible spoke of the end of the world, and the so-called scientists used to laugh at this idea and at Christians. Since he who laughs last, laughs the hardest, now we are the ones laughing. Faced with indisputable evidence, science had to concede that the world will cease to exist one day.

Atheists reacted to the Big Bang theory by coming up with their own Big Crunch theory, that is, that the universe would be expanding, as if it were a rubber band, until it could expand no further, then initiating the reverse process of contraction until it collapses on itself, with matter coming together all over again causing a new Big Bang. Thus, the universe would be a succession of Big Bangs and Big Crunches.

However, the second law of thermodynamics disproved this theory, because matter does not transform into energy without some loss. If this was not the case, it would be possible to make a machine that manufactures the energy it needs to keep itself going indefinitely. The sun will use up all its hydrogen and helium, just as the universe will use up all its energy until it disappears, and the little matter in this future universe will not have enough force of gravity to bind together. At that time, the universe will turn into a black hole.

Atheism or agnosticism is not intuitive – Intuition is the opposite of logic and deduction; if it was not for intuition, Einstein would never have arrived at the theory of relativity, for it is neither logical nor deduced from any observation. Intuition is both a qualitative and a quantitative leap. If I start from the observation of reality, I am catapulted by intuition to a reality that is neither observable nor experienceable, but that is related to what I observe and gives meaning to everything I observe.

In this sense, faith is an intuition; God is reached by intuition, but not only God: much of today's quantum physics, heir to the theory of relativity, is intuitive. Much of today's astronomy is intuitive, as we have no way yet of observing certain realities.

Atheism or agnosticism is inductive – Atheism or agnosticism is instigated; it is forced and supposes the repression of religious feeling, which is connatural to the human being and which we can observe in all times and in all places, and in most of the human beings who inhabit our planet today.

Theists have always made up more than 80% of the inhabitants of this planet in all eras, and in all cultures. To this day there have been many cultures and civilizations without science and technology, but there have never been any without religion.

Therefore, atheism or agnosticism is induced by fashion, by the consumer society, by communism, or by any ideology that seeks to remove all orientation from the human being; thus, disoriented and bewildered, he is much easier to manipulate and turn into an obsessive and neurotic consumer, which is very good for the economy since this makes the GDP grow but reduces the health of individuals. The healthier the economy, the sicker the individuals who feed it.

And for this, the religious feeling natural to the human being and present in all cultures of all times must be ignored at first, but since it always resurfaces, it must be repressed, hidden.

I maintain that there are no true atheists or agnostics, but rather polytheists, that is, they deny the existence of the one true God in order to pay homage, veneration, and worship to many small gods. Money would be the father of this pantheon, just as Zeus and Jupiter were the fathers of the Greek and Roman pantheons, respectively. Then there are gods who are the patrons of certain realities that the atheist or materialist relates to: power, beauty, pleasure, fame, entertainment such as football, etc.

What would a world governed by the materialistic worldview look like? It would be a world without music, without art, without poetry, without literature, without human rights, without ethics, an authentic barbarism, an authentic anarchy. What does the materialistic consumerist society leave for posterity?

Given that the reflection of religious feeling has left us almost all of the most beautiful monuments and works of humanity, the pyramids of Egypt, the Gothic cathedrals, the mosques, the Hindu temples, what could materialism leave us but the nausea of Sartre, the Soviet gulags, and the current Chinese concentration camps to brainwash the Uighur people?

Conclusion - Materialists claim that the human being is merely the point at which matter becomes self-aware. However, it makes little sense for matter to awaken only to realize it is matter. Self-awareness is a spiritual activity, suggesting that matter is oriented toward the spirit, not the other way around. Atheists and agnostics repress the innate religious feeling present in all ages and cultures, much like Puritans repressed sexuality.

Fr. Jorge Amaro, IMC