Integral Worldview

My reflection this year on worldview, as the skeleton or framework on which our ideals lie or the Magna Carta that governs our thinking and our lives, was inspired by reading a book called, The Powers That Be, by the Protestant theologian Walter Wink. The book is not about worldview, but about the powers that govern this world. However, in five pages of this book, Wink describes the 5 worldviews that have governed the imagination of human beings thus far.

These 5 worldviews are as follows: the ancient, the spiritualist, the materialist, the theological, and the integral. I understand that there are more worldviews than those cited in this book, and also many more beyond the ones I mention in this year's articles. As can be seen, three of the worldviews that Wink mentions are part of my study: the materialist, the spiritualist, and the integral, the latter is the topic of this text.

As we have said, the materialist worldview is the one that governs the world of culture, politics, arts, science, high finance, and universities. These environments have been completely sterilized of any religious sentiment, manifestation, thought or symbol. Western culture, the daughter of Christianity, has thrown its mother in prison and carried out an "ethnic cleansing" of many elements associated with Christianity.

As for other elements, Western culture stole them without mentioning their Christian origin, like for example, the baptismal registry books that the republicans that overthrew the monarchy in Portugal,  stole from the Churches to begin the civil registry. It also stole other elements by changing their names; historians, instead of saying before or after Christ, say before or after the common era to denote year.  

Western society has become so materialistic that it is almost inhuman, cold, selfish, and where nobody cares about anyone; individualism and selfishness have grown out of proportion; atheists and agnostics say they have values, but we do not see them in action anywhere. In this climate of such materialistic inhumanity, many take refuge in spiritualism and, following the law of the pendulum, adhere to a spiritualism that denies and demonizes all matter. They constitute small communities that are authentic oases in this materialistic desert.

The integral worldview is a worldview that seeks to reconcile man with his nature. As we have already said, we understand that modern man represses religious feeling in the same way that a Puritan society represses sex. The integral worldview also aims to overcome the dualisms typical of the spiritualist worldview, to seek the synthesis of these thesis and antitheses: spirit vs. matter, soul vs. body, creationism vs. evolutionism, sacred vs. profane, pure vs. impure, etc.

This new mentality, this new worldview, this new optic, and way of seeing things, is rising from the ashes of materialism, like a Phoenix reborn. It is not a crude, ignorant, reactionary spiritualism that has science as its enemy, but the living of religious feeling in the light of science, in constant dialogue with it. It is a faith that allows itself to be purified by science from all myths, superstitions, and irrationalism; it is a science that allows itself be guided and inspired by faith, that is not ashamed of it. Few are those who already live in this dimension, the majority of the population is either materialistic or spiritualistic.

History of Materialism
From religion to anti-religion, the history of materialism is a history of evolution of the experience of religious feeling. It all began with matter impregnated with spirit, breathing spirit through its every pore: this was the stage of animism. As human beings got to know the material realities of the world around them, they started stealing the souls of these realities.

In moving from animism to polytheism, human beings stole the souls from countless material realities, and to those handful few they did not know, they attributed to them the status of gods, that is, of leaders of a reality such as time, sea, love, war. For the sake of simplification, human beings concentrated these unknown realities into one single deity, but they did not stop there.

Because of the scientific discoveries of the 19th century and their practical applications in the 20th century, human beings began to think that they had discovered everything there was to discover. They became proud and so full of themselves that they destitute the religious sentiment, declaring that it was not God who had created man in his image and likeness, but rather man who created God in his image and likeness. Later, not content with his delusion, he killed God and put himself in his place.

Little by little, however, modern man is realizing that religious sentiment is neither an invention of ignorance nor an explanation for unexplainable things. The very fact that no matter how much the human being knows, there will always be things that he still does not know, proves that matter seems to have certain properties in common with Spirit after all.  

Some intellectuals of our time, not defining themselves as religious, go so far as to say that if God did not exist, he would have to be invented. Yes, because they recognize that this world, as it is structured, presupposes that most human beings are believers. Because if the contrary were true, things would not be as we find them in this world. So, as I have said elsewhere, atheists and agnostics are lucky that most are believers. In fact, the world as it is structured can survive with an agnostic minority, as long as the majority, as is the case, is a believer.

The integral worldview is going to suppose a return of what was stolen back to its owner; giving Spirit back to matter, because neither matter is as material as materialists think, nor is Spirit as immaterial and incorporeal as spiritualists think. The integral worldview will somehow imply a return to animism, but not the same uninformed animism of primitive men or ours when we were children; it will be an animism that will place the spirit at the center of every thing. Today we know from science that visible matter is after all composed of invisible and intangible subatomic particles.

Physics is the Soul of Science
When we talked about worldview and science, we said that scientific discoveries make us change our perspective about everything around us, the way we relate to the environment, our view of life; it is not the same to think that the Earth is the center of the universe than to think that it is not the Earth, but the Sun, and ultimately not even the Sun, is the center of a universe that probably has no center. It is not the same to think that matter and energy are two realities of a different nature than to think that matter is a form of energy and energy is a form of matter, just as water exists in three different physical states, and none is similar to the other, so much so that they even look like different realities.

Every scientific discovery can provoke a metanoia, a conversion, a change of mind, a worldview, or a new way of looking at things. Our mind, our faith, and our life have to adapt to the evolution of our knowledge of the reality that surrounds us and with which we relate. The science that can most stir our worldview is Physics, because it is the one that studies the most basic and fundamental things of our life, such as matter and the cosmos.

It is in this sense that we can state that the materialist worldview is out of fashion because it has not kept up with the latest scientific discoveries in the field of physics, especially quantum physics. The materialist worldview is right and makes sense in the context of mechanistic physics like Newton's, where reality works with the precision, cadence, rhythm, and prediction of a Swiss watch.

This worldview was itself misleading because it featured a watch without a watchmaker. But more than that, since Einstein we know that reality has nothing to do with the precision of a watch, but if it were a watch, it would not be precise as the Swiss kind, because it would be relative, that is, it would not always mark the same hours.

The New Quantum Physics and Quantum Mechanics
Quantum mechanics changes our minds, modifies our paradigms, attacks the logic that has governed science and our lives, because it breaks down boundaries that used to seem insurmountable and puts an end to the dualisms that opposed realities that we used to think were very different and even contrary, such as matter/energy, static/dynamic, visible/invisible, tangible/intangible, predictable/unpredictable, material/spiritual, scientific/philosophical.

Matter/Energy – The heart of matter is intangible like energy; the heart of matter, the world of atoms and subatomic particles is, in fact, energy.

Atoms can be matter, insofar as we try to weigh and measure them; but the particles that compose them have electric charges and move, that is, they exhibit the properties of energy. We can conclude that they are matter in their essence, describable, qualifiable and quantifiable, but that they are energy in their existence, because they exhibit a voltaic power, they react, and create waves.

Matter is energy in potential, energy is matter in potential. Combustion transforms matter into energy: this is what happens at the center of the sun, where hydrogen atoms fuse, creating helium and energy.

Visible, solid matter is composed of invisible elements, and the further we travel to the center of matter, the less matter (mass) and the more empty space we find, so matter seems to be reduced to tiny vibrating fibers of energy. Subatomic particles are in fact manifestations of energy. Therefore, what seemed so visible and solid is now reduced to electromagnetic waves. As the result, we can conclude that our body and everything that materially exists is reduced to vibrating energy.

Matter in itself does not exist, for it is merely a storehouse of energy, it is nothing more than condensed, accumulated energy. For example, plants, through photosynthesis, convert the radiant energy of the sun into chemical energy that is stored in organic molecules, as if the plant were a battery, a storehouse of energy.

Matter/Spirit - Materialism has no reason to exist, because matter is formed by invisible, almost spiritual elements, and we certainly cannot understand matter without knowing its soul. The atom is the soul of matter, so not only human beings have souls, matter does too. The soul of matter is as invisible as ours within our body.

Inert/Living - It is no longer clear that life only exists in organic matter; there is no longer such a big difference between organic matter and inorganic or inert matter. Subatomic particles reveal to us that life exists not only at the level of cells, but also at the subatomic level of quarks. Of course, this is a different form of life.

Visible/Invisible  - "If quantum mechanics hasn't shocked you deeply, it's because you haven't understood it yet. Everything we call real is made up of things that truly cannot be understood as real." Niels Bohr

The boundary between the visible and the invisible is also broken in matter. The mass of an atom is less than 1% of its size, the rest is void, that is, the space between the nucleus and the electrons. As stated above, if the nucleus of an atom were the size of a basketball, the electrons would be several kilometers away from the nucleus.

Static/Dynamic - The matter that forms objects appear static, it seems stationary, but in fact, this is an illusion: in reality, everything moves. As stated earlier, the electron orbits around the nucleus of the atom at a speed of 2,200 kilometers per second. Matter is therefore not static as it seems, but dynamic.

In quantum mechanics, everything is an illusion: visible matter is composed of invisible elements; it is apparently static, when in reality it is in motion; it is apparently very different from energy, but it is in fact a form of energy.

Pure/Impure - There is nothing outside a person that by going in can defile, but the things that come out are what defile, (Mark 7:15). ‘What God has made clean, you must not call profane.’ (Acts 10:15)

There was a time when the sexual act was seen as something dirty, ugly, sinful, and impure; It was only seen as a lesser evil when it was performed in the context of marriage for the sole purpose of procreation. But even then, Christian couples were advised not to enjoy the pleasure of sex and to abstain completely from sexual intercourse during Lent. For the rest, it was seen as a " remedium concupiscência", a palliative for voluptuousness, not as an act of love.

Love is the soul of the sexual act, which is one of the expressions of love in its function of uniting people into one body and one soul. And since it is the act by which the two will become one flesh (Mark 10:1-12), then resulting in three, the genesis of a human being is the fruit of the unitive love between two people, hence in no way can it be an impure act.

Sacred/Profane - When St. Paul tells us in 1 Corinthians that we are the temple of the Holy Spirit, and when Jesus tells us that instead of praying to be seen by others, we should do so in our room (Matthew 6:5), we should pray within ourselves in spirit and truth, not on Mount Gerizim or in the temple of Jerusalem (John 4:23-54), where then lies the profane? Was not everything created by God? If everything and everyone was created by God, nothing is profane, everything is sacred.

Good/Bad - Love as a human need (to love and to be loved) does not seem, at first glance, to be connected with morality, but it really is. When we judge we do not love, when we love we do not judge; universal love, especially love of enemies, overcomes the dualistic thinking of good versus evil, and can take us to the eternity that is God, the one who makes rain come down on the just as well as the unjust, and loves everyone unconditionally. We are called to be like Him.

It is also said that love is blind; that lovers tend not to see each other's faults and shortcomings, and naturally refrain from judging each other. And it also seems that when love disappears, only defects and deficiencies are seen. This leads us to conclude that only love can free us from being hypercritical of each other, taking us back to the Garden of Eden.

God/Devil  - There is only God, the devil does not exist, his myth was created to exonerate God from the creation of evil. Evil, or individual evils, were created by man when he misused his freedom. The possibility that this would happen, that is, the possibility that men could sin, choose evil, was created by God in making man free. There is no equally viable alternative to good, to God; he who does not gather with me, Jesus says, scatters, for there is no devil with whom he can gather....

Quantum Mechanics Proves the Power of Faith
Then the disciples came to Jesus privately and said, ‘Why could we not cast it out?’ He said to them, ‘Because of your little faith. For truly I tell you, if you have faith the size of a mustard seed, you will say to this mountain, “Move from here to there”, and it will move; and nothing will be impossible for you.’  Matthew 17:19-20

In classical deterministic mechanics, knowing the initial position and momentum (mass and velocity) of all particles belonging to a system, we can calculate their interactions and predict how they will behave.

This is not the case in quantum mechanics; Heisenberg's Principle highlights that it is impossible to know both the exact position an electron occupies in the electrosphere of an atom and the speed at which it moves around the nucleus; the more we know about its speed, the less we will know about its position, and vice versa.

According to Niels Bohr, when measuring a subatomic particle, the very act of measuring forces the particle to give up all possible places where it could be and (uncertainty principle) selects the location where you can find it; it is the act of measuring that forces the particle to make that choice.

Unlike Einstein, Bohr accepted that the nature of reality was inherently confusing; Einstein preferred to believe in the certainty of things in themselves and at all times, not just when they are measured or observed. Bohr even went on to say that he "would like the moon to stay in its place even when I'm not looking at it." When Einstein, already quite annoyed, said that "God didn't play dice," Bohr impassively replied, "Stop telling God what to do.”

"I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter as derivative from consciousness. We cannot be behind consciousness. Everything that we talk about, everything that we regard as existing, postulates consciousness." Max Planck (1858-1947) Nobel laureate, founder of quantum theory.

Integral Worldview
‘No one sews a piece of unshrunk cloth on an old cloak; otherwise, the patch pulls away from it, the new from the old, and a worse tear is made. And no one puts new wine into old wineskins; otherwise, the wine will burst the skins, and the wine is lost, and so are the skins; but one puts new wine into fresh wineskins.’  Mark 2:21-22

Those who still have their minds shaped by the deterministic principles and precision of mechanistic physics cannot understand quantum physics and mechanics. Their materialistic wineskins cannot understand a matter impregnated with spirit, bizarre, illogical, judicious, mystical; the Dane Niels Bohr, one of the creators of the new science, once said that only those who did not understand quantum physics were not scandalized by it.

The integral view of reality sees everything as having an outer and inner aspect. Heaven and earth are thus seen as the inner and outer aspects of a single reality. The spirit is at the center of every created thing. This inner spiritual reality is inextricably related to an outer form or physical manifestation.

Heaven or spirit is not up and matter down, but rather the spirit is within the matter. It is in a sense the immanence of God who is at the center of everything. Everything is in God and God is in everything. This is not pantheism that everything is God, but panentheism: everything is in God and God is in everything. This worldview is shared by Native American religions, which speak of father heaven and mother earth.

The soul or spirit, as described by St. John, is also governed by the same principle of uncertainty that governs the interior of matter in the subatomic particles from which it is formed: ‘The wind blows where it chooses, and you hear the sound of it, but you do not know where it comes from or where it goes. So it is with everyone who is born of the Spirit.’ John 3:8.

The integral worldview reconciles science with religion, matter with spirit, the inner world with the outer world. The enchanted world of subatomic particles has proved to the scientist that after all he cannot grasp everything with his reason and be the master of reality that he thought he was during the time of Newton's mechanistic physics. The new physics tells the man of today to "Grow up!”

Conclusion: the agnostic materialists, out of touch with the reality of today's quantum physics, continue to be formatted according to Newton's mechanistic physics; by robbing the spirit of matter, they eat a bread that feeds but tastes like nothing. The spiritualists, denying the corporeality of matter, live like penitent souls in a world that, being in itself a valley of pleasures and joys, has become a valley of tears. By stealing matter from spirit, they eat a bread that may taste good, but does not nourish. The integral worldview is like a whole grain bread, which nourishes and tastes good; it gives health to the body and joy to the soul.

Fr. Jorge Amaro, IMC

Spiritualist Worldview

When we speak of the Christian worldview, we are referring more to the contribution of Christianity to humanity and how humanity is indebted to it in many respects as a global religion. As we have spoken about the biblical worldview, referring to the Hebrew people, and therefore to the Old Testament; in speaking of the Christian worldview, we focus more on the content of the Christian narrative or, if you will, on Judeo-Christianity. The spiritualist worldview is a Christian worldview, but with a strong Greek influence.

During the time of Christ nothing was written down, in any language; the New Testament writings report in Greek the events that happened in Hebrew and Aramaic. That is, the authors of the New Testament were at the same time writing and translating. “Traductor, traditor” says the wise Latin proverb meaning the translator is a traitor.  The historical facts about Jesus of Nazareth occurred in a purely and exclusively Hebrew context; however, those who reported them to the world did so in a foreign language: Greek, knowing that they were doing so for Christian communities in the diaspora and that the new faith had little future in Israel.

From the Italian Peninsula to the west, the Romans imposed their language on the populations they conquered, because these peoples were primitive and did not know writing; but to the east of the Italian Peninsula, Greek prevailed, because it was the language of the soul of the rich Hellenic culture, which in many ways was superior to the Roman’s. For this reason, and because all the authors of the New Testament beginning with St. Paul knew Greek, it was in this language that they poured out the Word of God made Man.

Unbiblical Christian Worldview
‘…because he has fixed a day on which he will have the world judged in righteousness by a man whom he has appointed, and of this he has given assurance to all by raising him from the dead.’ When they heard of the resurrection of the dead, some scoffed, but others said, ‘We will hear you again about this.’ At that point Paul left them. Acts of the Apostles 17:31–33

Paul's discourse in the aeropagus is a clash of two different cultures, based on two different anthropologies or the human being’s ways of perceiving: the Greek dualistic one of mortal body and immortal soul, and the holistic biblical one of both the body and the soul can be mortal and immortal, depending on whether or not they adhere to the God of life.

The spiritualist worldview is not from biblical revelation, but rather an adaptation or enculturation of Christianity to the Hellenic culture, dominant in that time and place. This unrevealed worldview was imposed on the Church and governed it throughout the Middle Ages. It still rules many consciences today. As often happens in life, you go to others with the intention of converting them and they end up converting you. This is what happened when the new faith began to walk in the paths of ancient Greece.

God saw everything that he had made, and indeed, it was very good. And there was evening and there was morning, the sixth day. Genesis 1:31

In both the Old and the New Testaments, creation is a work of love. God liked what he made, never giving up on his work, especially the creation of human beings who, unlike other creatures, were created in his image and likeness.

In the second century, a new worldview emerged that challenged this Judeo-Christian belief that creation was basically good. In this new worldview, creation is not good, but evil. It represents the fall when the spirit or soul that lived with God was exiled into the body, into matter. The soul or spirit is intrinsically good, the matter is intrinsically evil. The world is a prison and as such, a "valley of tears”.

If the human being is composed of two opposing elements, then he lives a schizophrenic life as if he had two personalities. If this is so, how can we look positively on the incarnation of the Word of God, Jesus Christ?

Having become trapped in mortal bodies, the spirits became subject to the warped and ignorant powers that govern the world of matter. Consequently, sex and earthly life in general were considered evil. The task of religion was to rescue the spirit from the flesh, to recover the spiritual heaven from which the soul had fallen.

Gnosticism, Manichaeism, Neoplatonism, and the sexual attitudes associated with Puritanism, continue to be powerful factors in spiritualism today, in addition to sexual disorders, eating disorders, negative self-images, and the rejection of one's own body that led to the self-flagellation widely practiced by saints and non-saints, by friars, monks, and nuns, as well as by lay people.

This spiritualistic and negativistic view is reflected in the spirituality of many to this day, in placing much emphasis on gaining and not losing Heaven. As the catechism taught, the enemies of the soul come from three sources: the world, the devil, and the flesh, referring of course to the body, especially the sexualized body.

Spiritualism in the Bible
This negative worldview of the body and the world, of matter in general, infected the later writings of the New Testament, since they were already written at the end of the first century and the beginning of the second. Admittedly, we do not find this tendency in the earlier writings when Hellenism was not yet dominant in the Church.

Negative view of the world in St. John's writings
We know that we are God’s children, and that the whole world lies under the power of the evil one. 1 John 5:19

The word "world" appears 185 times in the New Testament, 78 in the Gospel of John, 8 in Matthew, 3 in Mark, and 3 in Luke. In the three letters of St. John, it appears 24 times. Compared to the other gospels and other New Testament’s writings, John uses and abuses the word "Cosmos" or world, why?

To the Greeks the world is not a divine creation. In this, John differs from them, since in the prologue of John’s Gospel, it is clear that the world is from God. However, John's description of the fallen world has many connotations to the Hellenistic conception of the world as completely opposed to God. The dualism in John is ethical rather than philosophical, that is, the struggle between the good of God and the evil of this world.

The world mostly appears in a negative light, as being the habitat of sin. Christians are in the world, but not of the world – this reminds us of Plato's cave and how in this world we live as exiles. The world was good in its essence because it was created by God, but once fallen, it is existentially evil. As St. John often repeats, this world, or the prince of this world, is a synthesis of all the forces inimical to God.

We conclude that the exaggerated use of the term "world," as well as the negativity associated with it, in comparison with other biblical authors, denotes an approximation of St. John to the Hellenic conception of the world as something fallen. In contrast, he then says that God wants to save the world, which represents a Christian thought, because for the Greeks the world has no salvation because it was neither created nor willed by God. He then turns around and says that the disciples, although they are in this world, are not of this world, a thought which is very dear to the Greeks.

Negative view of the body in St. Paul’s writings
Live by the Spirit, I say, and do not gratify the desires of the flesh. For what the flesh desires is opposed to the Spirit, and what the Spirit desires is opposed to the flesh… Now the works of the flesh are obvious: fornication, impurity, licentiousness, idolatry, sorcery, enmities, strife, jealousy, anger, quarrels, dissensions, factions, envy, drunkenness, carousing, and things like these. I am warning you, as I warned you before: those who do such things will not inherit the kingdom of God.

By contrast, the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, generosity, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control. There is no law against such things. And those who belong to Christ Jesus have crucified the flesh with its passions and desires. If we live by the Spirit, let us also be guided by the Spirit. Galatians 5:16-25

This classic text of St. Paul, written in his own handwriting, foreshadows a fundamentally Greek and unbiblical belief that the soul or spirit is essential and intrinsically good and, to paraphrase the gospel, is known by its fruits graphically described above. The body, or the flesh as Paul calls it, unlike the soul, is existentially and intrinsically evil. That is, neither the body can do good works nor the soul can do evil works.  

In biblical understanding and according to biblical anthropology, both body and soul can be evil, either one or the other can be good; there is no body without a soul and no soul without a body, many of the deeds listed above do not originate in the body, but in a perverted spirit, such envy for example, have little or nothing to do with the body.

Do you not see that whatever goes into the mouth enters the stomach, and goes out into the sewer? But what comes out of the mouth proceeds from the heart, and this is what defiles. For out of the heart come evil intentions, murder, adultery, fornication, theft, false witness, slander. These are what defile a person, but to eat with unwashed hands does not defile. Matthew 15:17-20

St. Paul's text on the works of the flesh is diametrically opposed to Jesus’ way of thinking in the gospel. Evil does not come from the world outside, but when it enters the body, the soul is already infected and corrupted; in other words, evil resides in the soul, it comes from within, it does not come from outside. Contrary to what St. Paul has said, evil does not originate in matter or in the flesh and then influences and corrupts the spirit, but the other way around, evil comes from the spirit which corrupts matter or flesh.

When we see an apple with a small hole on its skin, the hole was not made by a larvae trying to get into the apple, but by a larvae trying to get out of the apple. We are apples with a bug inside of us. Just as the apple was conceived with a worm, that is, when the plant was flowering, an insect deposited its egg which then hatched into a larvae, so we were conceived with the original sin, so that evil resides in us in our spirit, not in matter or body which is intrinsically evil according to Greek philosophy and anthropology.

Hebrew Anthropology
May the God of peace himself sanctify you entirely; and may your spirit and soul and body be kept sound and blameless at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. 1 Thessalonians 5:23

Hebrew anthropology, underlying biblical anthropology, is fundamentally unitary. This means that it intends to contemplate the entire personal reality from a certain perspective. Firstly, the human person is all of him "basal," that is, flesh. Secondly, the human person is "nefes", that is, he possesses a personality that we can approach from a psychological point of view (the psyche). And lastly, the human person is also all of him, "ruah", that is, spirit, insofar as we understand ourselves as beings open to the transcendent. We find clear testimony of this Old Testament anthropology in 1 Thess. 5:23, which is ultimately unitary because it looks at the whole of human reality from a certain perspective.

Greek Dualism
The Greeks are dualists in the purest of sense; for them there are two kingdoms, that of this world, which is existential, visible, transient, sensual, sensible, and deceptive, and that of God’s Kingdom, which is the essential, eternal, and unchanging. The human being has one foot in this world and one foot in the other world. His soul belongs to the realm of the essential, unchanging, and eternal, to God, and his body belongs to the realm of this world, of existence.

The body is not evil in itself, but it is a hindrance to the soul, a heavy burden. The body is the prison of the soul. Salvation, for Plato, lies in reason, which enlightened can come to dominate the passions of the body, governing life itself. With death, the soul is freed once and for all from the prison of the body to finally enjoy the immortality that is reserved for it, precisely because it is immortal in nature.

The French philosopher Descartes (1596–1650), an exponent of this kind of dualism, goes so far as to say, about the relationship between the soul and the body, that it is like that of the horse and rider; the soul is the rider, and the body is the horse that must be spurred on and guided by the rider. They are of a different nature and the connection between the two is very slight.

Theological Problems Raised by Greek Dualism
"This is all very confusing, please explain to me, Father," asked an Irish parishioner, "when we die our body goes to earth, our soul goes to Heaven and we, where do we go?"

According to Jewish anthropology, the human being is wholly saved or wholly condemned. We resurrect with a spiritual body that is the image of our physical body and composed of everything that the physical body has done well. We cannot do good without the body, without the head that thinks and projects, the heart that feels, and the hands that do work; therefore, the spiritual body is the glorification of our thinking head, our loving heart, and our working hands.

If the soul is immortal, if it is not biodegradable, then hell is eternal torture; however, if the soul is mortal, as biblical anthropology affirms, hell is eternal death, because eternal life is not contrary to eternal torture, but eternal death. Some Catholic theologians go so far as to say that hell is a nothingness, not a postmodern nihilistic nothing however, but something like an analgesic that would spare us the suffering of not having lived the life that God had reserved for us; it will be a nothingness, but a nothingness that hurts like fire. I find this position little different from the classical Catholic one: nothingness cannot hurt, and if it hurts, then it is not nothing, but eternal suffering.  

In Jewish anthropology, man does not have a mortal body and an immortal soul; man is all mortal if he is outside the Grace of God and all immortal if he is with God. Jesus tells us not to fear those who can only kill the body and can do nothing to the soul. What we should fear is the One who can kill both the body and the soul, (Matthew 10:28).

Hell, understood as eternal death, preserves both the goodness of God and the freedom of man. But what is eternal death? It is to return to the nothingness from which everything was created. He freely goes back to nothingness who answers "Nothing" to the 3 fundamental questions that every human being asks himself when he reaches the age of self-awareness: Where did I come from? Where am I going? What is the meaning of my life?

As stated above, the spiritualist worldview manifests itself in sub-worldviews, such as Gnosticism, Manichaeism, Puritanism, and what I call disintegrated schizophrenic dualism. Let us see what each of these mini worldviews is.

Gnosticism and Docetism
It is an ideology that predates Christianity that infiltrated Christianity when it first emerged. Fundamentally, Gnosticism repeats the Greek idea that what is human in us is our soul which is eternal and of divine origin, while the physical body, the prison of the soul, and its habitat, everything that surrounds it, the cosmos, that is, the world, were created not by God but by a demiurge, an imperfect spirit.

The final and definitive liberation only comes with death, but until this occurs, we can obtain a relative freedom through the acquisition of "gnosis", or knowledge, to be able to overpower the body and its base instincts and desires. Since Christianity is liberation from sin, and Gnosticism is liberation from ignorance, some Gnostics have assimilated Christianity, just as some Christians have allowed themselves to be carried away by Gnosticism. However, there is a radical difference between the two. Christianity is public, it is for everyone and not just for an occult elite of initiates, while Gnosticism is private and elitist, it is only for a few enlightened ones.

Docetism, a legitimate child of Gnosticism, comes from the Greek word "dokesis," meaning appearance. In the first and second centuries A.D., the Docetists claimed that Jesus Christ only appeared to be human. They considered the material world, including the human body, as to be so evil and corrupt that God, who is all good, could not have taken a true human body and human nature. Jesus' human nature is therefore feigned.

The Gnostic antagonism between the spiritual and material worlds led the Docetists to deny that Jesus was a true man. The Docetists had no problem with Jesus' divinity, they just did not believe in his true humanity. If Jesus' humanity is an illusion, then his passion and death on the cross with the suffering that this involved were also an illusion, they did not really happen.

The Christianity of Alexandria, which abandoned the Church with the council of Chalcedon in 451 A.D. later called Coptic, as well as that of Ethiopia, are Monophysite Docetists, believing only in the divine nature of Christ. It is no coincidence that Docetism arose in Egypt, precisely where years before Christianity Gnosticism had emerged. When I was in Ethiopia, I remember hearing a Coptic Christian hymn in which it said that Jesus did not suffer on the cross, he was content and happy.

Manichaeism
It was a very ancient religion of the Fertile Crescent, which disappeared with the rise of the great religions such as Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. What we know of Manichaeism is presented to us by some who were Manichaeans before they were Christians, such as St. Augustine (430 A.D.). Mani (277 A.D.), the founder, belonged to a Judeo-Christian group before founding his own religion. He felt he was the heir of the great prophets Buddha, Jesus, Zarathustra, and Mohammed, and sought to make a synthesis of their teachings. He proclaimed himself an apostle of Jesus, because of all the religions, he found himself closest to Christianity.

Manichaeism is a form of Christian Gnosticism, so dualistic that the very word Manichaeism has historically become synonymous with absolute dualism. In the world there are two forces that oppose each other: light/good and darkness/evil. The soul, of course, belongs to light and the body to darkness, so the goal of human life is for light to prevail over darkness. Mani advised his faithful to lead an ascetic life, not to kill any living thing, not to eat meat, not to drink alcohol, and to live a celibate life.

Puritanism
Historically, Puritanism was a 16th and 17th century movement that sought to "cleanse" the Church of England from the remnants of Catholicism.

It was not entirely successful in England, but in the New World of America, the movement flourished and became a way of life, very evident even in their way of dressing.

Today’s modern usage of the word puritan has nothing to do with its historical root, but more to do with a negative view of sex and the pleasure associated with it. Sex was restricted to marriage, which in this sense was seen as a remedy for concupiscence, and as a means for procreation. It is better to marry than to be aflame with passion, as St. Paul said (1 Corinthians 7:8-9).

The excessive value placed on virginity, especially that of female physical virginity, that is, an intact hymen, has led to the declaration that Mary was a virgin before, during, and after childbirth. I can understand that she was a virgin before childbirth and after childbirth, and I accept and believe that she was, but I do not see why she has to be a virgin during childbirth, something that is unnatural and unnecessary which I can only understand in the context of a negative view of sex and an extrapolated valuation of physical virginity at the expense of motherhood.

Virginity has no value in itself, but is oriented towards motherhood, whether it is a physical motherhood of a woman who is the mother of a baby, whom she nurtures and nourishes to make it an authentic human being, or of a woman who puts marriage aside to be the mother of more children in a spiritual and educational sense, like Mother Teresa of Calcutta. Virginity understood in this way has nothing to do with whether or not the hymen is ruptured, because it is a human value for both men and women.

Disintegrated Schizophrenic Dualism
In this sub-worldview, we find many intellectuals and men of science, arts, politics, high finance who are, at the same time, profoundly Christian, that is, they do not follow the materialistic worldview that is dominant in these circles.  

These skilled professionals in their field – scientists, doctors, university professors, politicians, and journalists – in failing to reconcile their faith with science, made within themselves a gentlemen's agreement, that is, they have placed these two dimensions in separate rooms of the same house that is their mind. These are closed rooms that do not communicate with each other, that is, they live simultaneously in their minds a dualism and a mental and existential schizophrenia.

They are at the same time men of science and men of faith; however, since they have not found the formula to reconcile the two, and since they somehow think they are irreconcilable, they live the two dimensions separately, as if it were a modern state where religion does not meddle in politics and politics does not meddle in religion. To such State-Church separation, give to Caesar what is Caesar's, and to God what is God's.

By way of example, such scientists and professionals during the week are evolutionists, that is, they believe in the theory of the evolution of the species, and on Sunday, the Lord's Day, they are creationists, that is, they believe in the book of Genesis as if it were a history book; as long as they never put the two positions in dialogue, there is no problem.

What happens inside these scientists and good professionals in their field is what happens in society in general: science lives with its back turned on religion and considers it the stuff of ignorance, while defensive religion takes refuge in its churches and demonizes science.

Conclusion: The materialist worldview ignores the spiritual dimension of human life, just as the spiritualist worldview demonizes the corporeal dimension. Truth requires that the two dimensions integrate and harmonize: no spirit without matter, no matter without spirit. 

Fr. Jorge Amaro, IMC