The Hidden Face of Christmas

Every reality has a reverse side just like a coin. The moon always presents us with the same face, but there is another face that is veiled to us. In Christmas time, there are nativity scenes of all kinds: big ones, tiny ones, but they all have a part that cannot be seen. Underneath the green moss is the whole structure, stones, wood, water pipes, electric wires, small mechanisms, etc.

The first Christmas, the real Christmas, also had a hidden face that not many people are aware of. We read the Christmas story in the light of the many Christmases we have already lived through, as well as the concept that today’s Western society has of Christmas. We therefore neglect details that we even know are there, at least theoretically, but we hide them so as not to ruin the spirit of Christmas and the Christmas joy that we are supposed to feel at this time.  In the north central mountains of Portugal, called “Serra da Estrela”, where I was born, they like to say, “Well milked sorrow is the cream of joy". Underneath the Christmas joy there is a well milked sorrow; that is, a sorrow that was so well processed and managed that it turned into joy.

Maria appeared pregnant
On her return from a visit to her cousin Elizabeth that lasted several months, Mary appeared pregnant. What could she say? How could she explain what has happened? Becoming pregnant by the work and grace of the Holy Spirit was unprecedented, it was a unique event in human history; it had never happened before and was never going to happen again. It was expected that the Messiah, whom the people of Israel awaited and still awaits, would appear in a natural way from the house of David.

Jesus’ Christmas was Mary’s Easter or passion. The Lord’s Passion was also Mary's passion. Still today, even in a society that is neither puritanical nor sexist, a sex scandal delights the mouths of many people. It seems that our own self-esteem grows when we see others’ sinking. There is nothing more degrading and stigmatizing than a sex scandal: everyone points the finger at you, you live without honour and with a name that is forever ruined, it is like dying while still alive.

"Calumnia, que algo queda" says a Spanish proverb, that is, “Slander that something will remain forever” or “Throw enough mud at the wall, some of it will stick”; in other words, cast doubt on someone in areas of sexual behaviour and that person's bad reputation will follow him to the grave. It may even turn out to be a lie, no matter, people will always remain in doubt, they will cling to the first report as being true and the denial as being a lie. These scandals open the television news and make the front page of the newspapers while the denials appear in a lost column inside the newspaper that no one reads.

Physical death by stoning was also very close... Mary was considered an adulteress because she was betrothed to Joseph, and although they were not yet living together, for the purposes of the law she was already married to him. Such a relationship can no longer be broken, unless there was a divorce. We well know what was the punishment for adulterous women ... (John 8:1-11) they were stoned to death.

What used to happen in Israel on a regular basis is still happening today in some Muslim countries where Sharia law applies; there are videos on certain websites that document these sad facts in the 21st century.

Already many, thirsting for blood, had stones ready in their hands, waiting for Joseph, the injured party, to cast the first stone. Casting the first stone was a right that belonged to the one offended. Casting the first stone was, at the same time, a declaration of the verdict by the offended and the first act of execution of the sentence, which the bloodthirsty hypocrites were gladly waiting to carry out.

For Jesus, in the episode of the adulterous woman (John 8: 1-11), the right to cast the first stone, that is, to judge and pass a death sentence, is not the right of the injured party, nor of the one who has authority by delegation or election, but of the one who has the moral authority, that is, the one who is without sin.

Jesus does not believe in retributive justice because it is nothing more than legalized revenge, it is the old decree of “an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth”. On the contrary, Jesus believes in restorative justice, the one that God practices, because he does not want the death of the sinner, but that he repents, converts and lives (Ezekiel 18:23-32).

Joseph's dream
Joseph was a righteous man and he was certainly not going to stone Mary; but the reason he was not going to stone her was not so much that he was indeed righteous and good, but because he loved Mary unconditionally; love goes beyond what is purely and coldly legal, unconditional love forgives. There are no crimes of passion in unconditional love.

One day, a married man with five children said to me, "If I knew my wife was unfaithful to me, I would divorce her right away.” “Great is the love you have for your wife,” I said in a sarcastic way, “you don't love your wife, you love yourself. Her infidelity does nothing to an unconditional love, it only disturbs a self-love.” He who truly loves is sad, but does no harm to the object of his love; because love, as St. Thomas Aquinas says, is to will the good of the other.

The second Joseph in the Bible, the spouse of the Blessed Virgin Mary, after his ancestor Joseph of Egypt, was also a dreamer who let himself be guided by his dreams. Dreams are in fact a star in our lives; they are messages from the subconscious to the conscious or even from God Himself. They are phantasmagoric and highly exaggerated so to make them more difficult to forget during the day; if they were not, they would be easily forgotten and upon waking, we would remember nothing.

Dreams are always subjective; they are ours, even when we dream about other people or places. We are always the subject of our dream, never a place or another person; what appears in our dreams are not objectively the places or the people, but its deep psychological significance to us; that is, what these places and people mean to us.

After his dream, Joseph had the same knowledge as Mary; and so, he was going to share with her the same pain and undergo the same passion, suffering all this with resilience and in silence as Mary was proficient in doing (Luke 2:19) because there was no reasonable way, they could explain the situation to anyone and excuse Mary... Mary was destined to bear the stain and the shame for the rest of her life.

As for Joseph, our patriarchal society considered a man that accepts such a woman as being dispossessed of his manhood. And since I want to depict the pain of Mary and Joseph in a very graphic and real way, I dare to write here the slang used for such men, that is, a “sweet cuckold”.

Jesus, the son of Mary
Mary treasured all these words and pondered them in her heart (Luke 2:19), and suffered in silence, not being able to defend herself against the slanders... The suffering lasted her whole life, as is natural in cases like this.

Here and elsewhere in the gospel, this stigma resurfaces, for example in one of the confrontations that Jesus had with the Pharisees, in John’s Gospel at one point they said, “We are not illegitimate children” (John 8:41), so as to say… “as you are…”

“Is not this the carpenter, the son of Mary and brother of James and Joses and Judas and Simon, and are not his sisters here with us?” Mark 6:3

In a patriarchal society, no one is known as the son of his mother, that is, no one is known by reference to his mother, but by reference to his father. Let us remember that Jesus when addressing Peter in a personal way, to ask him if he loves Him, calls him by his family name in reference to Peter's father and not his mother: "Simon, son of John...” (John 21:15-19).

The evangelist Mark, despite being a Hebrew from Jerusalem, writes his Gospel in Rome for the Romans and not in half measures: he relates the truth as it is. Jesus is called by reference to his mother and not by  his father. Even if the father had died, a Hebrew would never be called by reference to his mother; if they did, it was because Jesus was, to the people of his time, the son of an unknown father; to the shame of his mother and Himself.

Matthew, the Gospel written for the Jews, corrects and says, “Is not this the carpenter’s son? Is not his mother called Mary? And are not his brothers James and Joseph and Simon and Judas?” (Matthew 13:55-56). Luke, in his Gospel, also records the episode of the Lord's visit back to his hometown; however, as a respect for Jesus he does not copy Mark, but he does not tell a lie either like Matthew, so he chooses not to reveal what his countrymen called him.

Conclusion: The birth of Jesus was experienced by Mary and Joseph as a lifelong passion and death. Unable to explain her pregnancy, she the one that for us had been conceived and conceived without sin, in her social environment, had to live the rest of her life stained with the most defamatory sin of all times.

Fr.  Jorge Amaro, IMC

 

A Reason Hijacked by Irrationality

Like sheep, they are led to the grave, where death will be their shepherd. In the morning the godly will rule over them. Their bodies will rot in the grave, far from their grand estates. Psalm 49:14

After 5 million years of evolution, since our ancestors in Africa started to shed most of their body hair and to gain intelligence, I believe that to this day, animal instinct still rules over human intelligence.

As it is with all the living beings on this planet, our behaviour and most of our actions are motivated by instinct, both at the individual as well as at the social level. The only difference compared to other living beings is that we are smarter. We would be superior if intelligence were motivated by and at the service of good. But since it is smartness motivated and put at the service of lower instincts, we end up being worse than animals. Animality directs, dictates, inspires and motivates our intelligence, and not as it should be, intelligence directing our animality.

Science tells us that human life begins the moment a male half-cell called spermatozoid unites with a female half-cell called ovum, forming a human cell with a unique genetic code. This zygote immediately subdivides and multiplies over the course of nine months to form a complete human being, it only needs to be left alone for this to happen. Despite knowing this, we are the only animals that kill our own offspring while it is still in the mother’s womb and we do it by the millions every year. The same people who claim that science is the truth and should have the last word in everything, go against science to justify this abominable act.

Animals do not kill their own kinds; they may fight among themselves to prove dominance of some sort, but they do not kill their own species for the sake of killing. We humans, since Cain and Abel, have been killing our own brothers and sisters, and even those who gave birth to us. If our behaviour were dominated by reason, conflicts like the Arab-Israeli and others that have been going on for many years would have been resolved long ago.

The Germans who regard themselves as homeland of philosophers and very rational people, have Hitler, the ultimate exponent of reason at the service of irrationality. By murdering 5 million Jews, he took human intelligence at the service of anger to uncharted territory. And the irony is that he thought he was freeing and purifying humanity from an evil race. Contrary to this antisemitic ideology, Jews have won more Nobel prizes than any other people including the Germans. Hitler is joined by Stalin, Mao Tse Tung, Pol Pot and all the dictators and tyrants throughout human history.

Not long ago, the self-proclaimed Islamic State raped women and children with immunity, even cutting the heads off the citizens of our countries in front of television cameras with a hair-raising coldness. They do so with complete immunity because, although they hurt our sensibility, they do not hurt our economic interests, so… why should we bother?

Individual anachronism
I do not understand my own actions. For I do not do what I want, but I do the very thing I hate.  Romans 7:15

St. Paul was already aware that we are anachronistic beings: we do what we know beforehand to be wrong. And since it is irrationality that directs our lives, to justify to ourselves and to others that we are rational beings, we use what in psychology is called rationalization mechanisms. We justify the evil that we do in order to hurt ourselves less or to silence our conscience which accuses us. We do what the fox in the fable did with the grapes: instead of accepting its inability to reach them hanging on the vines, the fox declared them unripe and thus not worth getting.

We know that certain foods are bad for our health, and yet we consume them anyway. As we see ourselves naked, like Adam and Eve after they ate the apple, we defend our gluttony by saying, "Forgive the evil it does for the good it tastes", or "Live life to the fullest, for the future is uncertain" or even "we have to die from something so why not this". If an animal had self-awareness and could speak, it would say this very thing.

Social anachronism
Somebody said once: “Stop asking “what type of world will we leave our children?” and start asking instead “what type of children will we leave this world?”

As a society, we confront our irrationalities by adding them up, instead of confronting them individually. Since it is the lower instinct that inspires our intelligence, most of the inventions that have made our lives more comfortable were not born out of peace, but out of war.

First the atomic bomb was born and only later was its peaceful application of producing electricity found. The microwave we use to heat our dinner was born of the radar system used in World War II to detect enemies; GPS was not born to guide us on the roads, but to guide missiles to their destination.

History has proven again and again that we are much more creative in doing evil than in doing good. In the budget of almost every country there is more money allocated to promote war than to promote peace.

The so bright country of the United States of America is hostage to a second amendment that gives its people the right to own any types of weapons, even those that are used by soldiers. This “bloody” second amendment has already killed thousands of students and teachers in schools, and yet it seems like the amendment cannot be changed as if it was a kind of gospel that cannot be rewritten. All other countries can change their constitutions and update them to modern times, but not so the United States.

We know that meat raised with growth hormones in half the time, and vegetables and fruits treated with chemical fertilizers and pesticides are a major cause of cancer increase in Western societies. Yet we do nothing rational to solve the problem. We create a parallel organic farming, not with the intention to watch over public health, but as another way to make money.

The funny thing is that the word “amendment” comes from the Latin word “emendation” that means a correction, an edition or something added. So, the second amendment is something that was already edited and corrected but it can’t be corrected anymore. Very strange…

Car models using alternative energy source to petroleum appeared but were immediately removed from the market, because they were hurting the interests of big oil companies. It is said that there are cures for various diseases and that they are not made public because the pharmaceutical companies are making tons of money from these diseases and, for these companies, health is of little interest.

We do not yet know the ecological and human health impact of GMOs, but we already use them on a large scale because they are so profitable. At the forefront of transgenics is the seed company Monsanto, which to create dependency in the poor of the third world, has modified the seeds so that they produce only one harvest, forcing the poor to buy seeds from them the following year. Over time, the seeds that God created disappear, that is, those that result from the previous harvest and germinate for a new harvest.

Unsustainability of our development model
Mr. Adam Smith, in his book The Wealth of Nations, said that everyone should seek their own interest since an invisible hand would seek the common good and interest. He must have been very happy with his cleverness when he discovered this theory, but if we think about it, it is nothing but the intellectual version of the law of the jungle.

Capitalism has never sought nor wanted the common good. In fact, if Mr. Smith were alive today, he would know that already in 2016, the 1% of humanity owned more wealth than the remaining 99%, that a handful of people owned exactly 54%, that is, more than half of the world's wealth, he would be ashamed of his theory. Where then is this “bloody” invisible hand that would bring equality?

From a political, economic and even ecological point of view, our development model is unsustainable and unviable. Our planet will die long before we have the ability to transport ourselves to another planet. There are those who live in denial and argue that climate change is due to normal cycles of our planet. They deny that the rampant air and sea pollution has any effect on the health of our planet.

There are precedents and these should make us think. The Mayan civilization is an example of a development model that was unsustainable and, as such, came to an end. The pyramids, palaces and monuments that the Mayans were able to build had already been swallowed up by the jungle by the time the Spaniards arrived there. The Mayans, dispersed, had returned to subsistence agriculture.

In the face of this tragedy that is about to befall us once again, we still behave like animals. Some think like the donkey that said: “No more grass should grow after I die, I won't be needing it anymore”, let those who come after take care of themselves; others prefer not to see, like the ostrich that hides its head under the sand so as not to see the danger: What the eye doesn't see the heart doesn't grieve over, and there are occasions when the truth is just too bitter to swallow. So just don’t swallow it and stupidly or irrationally trust your luck.

I didn't want this panorama to seem so bleak, there are people here and there throughout human history who have subjugated instinct to the service of intelligence and have been capable of great deeds. But these are only a few swallows, not enough to make a summer.

Only Christ can save us from ourselves
In our sheepishness, like a flock of sheep, we move inexorably towards death and death itself is our shepherd, says the psalm mentioned above. We are suicidal and we don't even realize it. Only God can save us from ourselves.

It is by obeying God's will and not our own that we can free us from ourselves. God likes us more than we like ourselves, He defends our interests better than we can; it is love for God that saves us from ourselves. The unhealthy love we have for ourselves leads us to our own annihilation just as it did for Narcissus.

In its entirety, humanity has not yet reached adulthood; it continues to behave like a frivolous, irresponsible child, doing whatever gives him the greatest pleasure, completely oblivious to the consequences in the future from the present orgies.

For Freud, human maturity is the passage from the pleasure principle to the reality principle; that is, abandoning behaviours that produce immediate pleasure (pleasure principle) for the knowledge that we have of the harmful effects that these behaviours will cause on the long term (reality principle). Fundamentally, Jesus had already said this when he stated: "If any want to become my followers, let them deny themselves and take up their cross daily and follow me." Luke 9:23

Conclusion – If, knowing what suits us, we do whatever we feel like, reason is at the service of instinct. Only when we manage to postpone the immediate gratification of our impulses and do what suits us then we can put our instincts at the service of reason and we can be genuinely human.

Fr. Jorge Amaro, IMC

The Kingdom of God

Strive first for the kingdom of God and his righteousness, and all these things will be given to you as well. Matthew 6:33

Because there are few monarchies left and to try to update the anthropomorphisms of the Gospel, someone suggested that, in keeping with today's world, we should give Jesus the title of President instead of King. "The cure is worse than the disease" – while the President is usually voted in by the people, Christ, like all kings, was born into the kingship.

The President rules a republic which in Latin means public affair; Christ reigns over the universe because it belongs to Him. Everything, including us, is God's property, for He created it all. We are merely stewards, not owners, of creation, and for that matter, not owners even of our own lives.  

A king without blue blood
‘You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their great ones are tyrants over them. It will not be so among you; but whoever wishes to be great among you must be your servant, and whoever wishes to be first among you must be your slave; just as the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life a ransom for many.’  Matthew 20:25-28

Christ is therefore the sovereign King of everything and everyone but he is a King without blue blood because he came into the world to serve and not to be served, (Mark 10.45; Luke 22:27). Since Christ is not a King like other worldly kings, neither is his kingdom like that of other worldly kingdoms, (John 18:36).

On the day Jesus was acclaimed as King, he entered the capital city, Jerusalem, mounted not on a majestic white horse, like the kings of this world, but on a ridiculous donkey; while a horse is used for war, a donkey is used for work and trade, for peace, and Jesus is the Prince of Peace.

Mounted on a donkey and acclaimed as King at the gates of Jerusalem, Jesus laughs at those enamoured with power who use it to subjugate others. On the contrary, Jesus came not to be served like the powerful men of this world, but to serve.

"I am among you as one who serve", (Luke 22:27). The kings of this world, through taxes, suck the blood out of their subjects. Jesus, on the other hand, gives his life, gives his blood for his friends and all humanity. His throne was not of pleasure, pride and ostentation, but of Cross of ignominy and torture; his crown was not of gold encrusted with precious stones, but of thorns driven into his skull.

In saying, "Whoever wishes to be first among you must be your slave”, (Matthew 20:27), Jesus substitutes love for power for the power of love. Who are the most important people in our lives? Aren't they the ones who served us the most, starting with our parents? And who are the most important figures for mankind? Not likely those who had the most power and dominated the most but rather those who have loved and served humanity selflessly the most.

Church and Kingdom in the preaching of Jesus
In stark contrast to the word CHURCH, which appears 112 times and almost all in the Acts of the Apostles and in the Letters, the word KINGDOM appears 162 times and, of these, only 35 times appears in the book of Acts and the Letters; the remaining 127 times are found in the Gospels. This demonstrates how important the Kingdom of God was for Jesus and how unimportant this same Kingdom was for the nascent Church founded by Christ.

                                       KINGDOM                       CHURCH
NEW TESTAMENT            162                                    112
GOSPELS                            127                                        2
ACTS / LETTERS                 35                                    110

After the Second Vatican Council, the Church stopped looking at her navel and began to look at the world like Jesus did, and to see in it the Kingdom that is already in our midst since Jesus came into the world, but not yet in its fullness. The Mission began with God sending his firstborn Son into the world. The goal of this mission has always been to transform the world into the Kingdom of God; before this moment and since our forefathers, the world belonged to sin.

The Church, as the mystical body of Christ, can have no other objective but to continue the work of Christ. Therefore, the purpose of her existence is not to implant herself in every corner of this earth, but to bring the Good News of the Kingdom to every corner of the world.

The main objective is not to produce Christians, to increase their numbers, but rather to unite all people of good will, of other religions, atheists or agnostics and together with them, to aid in building a better world, a more just and fraternal society, where justice, peace and harmony, and love reign among peoples. If this had been the objective of the Church from the beginning, as it was of her founder, there would have been no fundamentalism such as the Inquisition, nor holy wars such as the ones driven by the Crusades.

The Church does not exist for herself nor should she preach herself, because her Master and founder did not preach himself: the Church exists for the Mission, that is, to continue the work of her founder and the purpose of the Mission which is the Kingdom. Church is what we are, it is our identity, the Kingdom is our mission, it is what we do.

Kingdom of justice, peace and the integrity of creation
For the kingdom of God is not food and drink but righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Spirit. The one who thus serves Christ is acceptable to God and has human approval.  Romans 14:17-18

The Kingdom of God is a kingdom where economic progress is not the only factor of development, for man does not live by bread alone (Matthew 4:4). In the Kingdom of God, the economy is a healthy economy because it grows hand in hand with social justice, peace and the good of entire creation.

Sustainable development starts from the principle that it is possible to have a supportable and viable economic development without destroying the environment or compromising the habitability of the planet for future generations, or threatening justice and world peace.

Sustainable development is one that harmonizes economic growth with the reality of the biosphere or the protection of the environment with the individual and social needs of all peoples who inhabit the planet, that is, with the social inclusion of all.

Development viewed solely as economic growth has destroyed the environment and caused deep social inequalities. For development to be sustainable, it must be three-dimensional, that is, the aspects of social justice and environmental protection must be as important as economic growth.

It is a Kingdom of inclusion not exclusion
There is no longer Jew or Greek, there is no longer slave or free, there is no longer male and female, for all of you are one in Christ Jesus. Galatians 3:28

The Kingdom of God is a city without walls, without borders, because it is a city open to all; it is a round table like the world, it is the bread for the multitudes. There are no differences between people because we are all children of the same Father.

All humans are God’s creatures and through Jesus Christ, redeemed at the price of his blood, are made adopted children of God. United by the same human nature; dignity is due to all human beings without distinction of ethnicity.

In clear contrast and opposition to St. Paul, who in 1Corinthians 11: 7-9 alludes to chapter 2 of the book of Genesis to say that man is superior to woman because she was formed from a rib of the man, Jesus when speaking of divorce quoted Genesis 1, where it says, "man and woman He created them", thus affirming his conviction of gender equality.

Jesus is the only founder of religion who never made a derogatory statement about women, not even the prostitutes did he ever criticize. Unlike the rabbis of his time, he never warned anyone against the danger of dealing with women in general for their seductive tricks. On the contrary, he warned men against their own lust and urged them to take responsibility for their impulses and instincts, (Matthew 5:28-29).

There is no accusation or criticism of the other
In the Kingdom of God no one accuses or exposes anyone. The real reason to bring accusation against others is that when we point at others and expose their sin, we are humiliating them, which is an indirect way of exalting ourselves. Since bragging about how good we are is too conspicuous and frowned upon socially, we criticize and denigrate others to make ourselves shine.

As Jesus noted in the case of the sinful woman caught in adultery (John 8:1-11), those who abound in criticizing others are deficient in self-criticism. It is not by criticizing others that we progress spiritually and humanly, but by criticizing our very selves.

In this same episode of the adulterous woman (John 8:1-10), Jesus turns the table on the accusers by saying that only those without sin have the moral authority to judge who is in sin. He then exhorts us to be self-critical, to pay more attention to the log that is in our own eye than to the speck in someone else's eye, (Matthew 7:3-5).

Nonviolence replaces violence
This Kingdom does not conquer land or people by violence. Violence subdues the body, but it does not subdue the heart or the mind. Violence is not a means to a good end because it only creates more violence that keeps growing. The only peace that can be obtained by violence is the peace of the cemetery.

It is not with hatred that we win over our enemies; our hatred only makes them stronger against us. Only love conquers them and manages to turn them into our friends; only love disarms them. The entrance to the citizenship of the Kingdom of God is not through conquest or subjugation, but by conversion, by metanoia; that is why the entrance is free.

The end of religion
The Gospel of St. Matthew, the Gospel of the Kingdom, reminds us in chapter 25 that, in the end, we will not be judged by who we are, by our identity, for being Christians, atheists or Muslims, but by what we have done or failed to do, whether or not we have assisted the thirsty, the hungry, the naked, the pilgrims, the imprisoned, the foreigners, and the sick. Because helping them was the goal of Jesus' life and his coming into the world, this very goal must be our goal too.

On the individual level – Jesus replaces religion with psychology by saying that the only commandment is the commandment of love; whatever may be our religion or ideology or lack thereof, without love there is no human life. Also at the individual level, he presented himself as the only Way, Truth and Life, that is, as the reference of humanity and how to live as an authentic human person.

On the social level – The Kingdom of God is also not of a religious nature, but a question of justice and peace; it is therefore a civil issue that can very well be dealt with in sociology.

Finally, at the last judgment, according to Gospel of Matthew chapter 25, there is no religious question, all questions are of civil nature. Since there is no personal self-realization or happiness without love and since there is no social justice without love of neighbour, at the end of our lives we will be judged only and exclusively by how little or how much we have loved.

When Jesus appeared to St. Paul on the road to Damascus, he did not ask him why are you persecuting my brothers and sisters, my disciples, but why are you persecuting Me, (Acts 22, 1-16). In Matthew 25, we learn that both good and evil and the absence of both have a price, and that since Jesus took on human nature, no human being lives helpless with no one to defend him, because he has Jesus as his elder brother. For this reason, we will have to answer before the King for everything we have done or failed to do to anyone who has crossed our path in life.

Conclusion – The Constitution or Magna Carta that governs the Kingdom of God is summed up by one word: LOVE. Therefore, a citizen of this Kingdom is one who loves God above everything and everyone including himself, who loves himself as God loves him, and who loves others as he loves himself.

Fr. Jorge Amaro, IMC

The End of the World

For centuries the Church and the Bible have been ridiculed for claiming that the world will end.

The idea that the world has always existed has ensnared even Catholics who have yet to realize that if the world did not have a beginning and does not have an end, then the existence of God lacks meaning. The truth is that the world, as we know it, can end by many ways.

Pathogens, biological weapons, a virus
Men have used poison with the intention to kill since the beginning of civilization, not only against individual enemies, but also occasionally against armies. Since Emperor Barbarossa poisoned water wells with human bodies in Tortona, Italy, in 1155, until World War I and II, through its use in China by the Japanese, and more recently in Iraq, biological weapons have become "the poor man’s atomic bomb," as Block, an American scientist, wrote.  

With our increasing knowledge of the biology of disease-causing agents -- viruses such as AIDS, Ebola and SARS-CoV-2, pathogens such as typhus and smallpox, and toxins such as anthrax and numerous types of bacteria -- it is legitimate to fear the possibility of a large-scale biological war. Biological weapons offer terrorist groups and "rogue states" an affordable way to counter the overwhelming military superiority of the United States and other nuclear powers.

The current crisis of COVID-19 has included accusations of biological warfare. The existence of a high-security virology laboratory in Wuhan has fuelled some theories and accusations that China had deliberately unleashed an attack. The hypothesis that the virulence of a virus like the one of 1918, which killed 50 million people worldwide and the current one that is already in excess of 5 million, was necessarily man-made is further proof of anthropocentric arrogance and irrational faith in science.

For millions of years nature has been producing viruses and pathogens, such as the Black Death virus that devastated Europe in the Middle Ages, without any help of man’s science. Man's meagre ability to create viruses is no more than 10 years old, and so far, laboratories have yet to create any as destructive as what mother nature has done in the past.

On the other hand, there is a war raging between pathogens created by nature and the antibiotics created by men to fight them. So far, antibiotics have worked, but there are already pathogens resistant to the strongest antibiotics so that we don't know what is in store for us, as my mother used to say.

Impact of a meteorite
The moon with its large craters is a testimony of the constant bombardment by these rocks or metals of great proportions, pieces of stars and planets, that populate the universe and move without regular orbits, like some comets.

We ourselves are witnesses to the fall of these celestial bodies on Earth when at night we see them as shooting stars. The Earth's atmosphere protects us from these bodies. When they collide with our atmosphere, most of them incinerate and pulverize, falling over our planet as tiny particles.

But this does not always happen and there are footage of these meteorites larger than a soccer ball falling on Earth. And there are still larger ones at the NASA museum in Washington.

All of Earth's nuclear charges might not be enough to break up a meteorite like the one that wiped out the dinosaurs if by an unfortunate chance, it is on a collision course with Earth. On the other hand, the impact of comets or meteorites, depending on their size, disturbs the initial inertia of a planet and can slow it down or even project it out of orbit, which would be fatal to life on our planet. The danger is real, it has already happened once that we know of and caused the extinction of the dinosaurs, and it could happen again, causing the end of life on planet Earth.

Nuclear conflict
At the end of the Cold War, the planet's nuclear arsenal was enough to destroy it not once, but 10 times. After treaties were signed, especially between the United States and Russia, it is likely that today there are far fewer atomic weapons.

However, these two countries are not the only ones that have them. The world wars started with few countries but gradually more and more got involved. The nature of violence is to increase exponentially. North Korea, for example, could start a nuclear war that would gradually involve atomic powers and this will certainly be unstoppable. There is also the danger that nuclear bombs can fall into the hands of terrorists.

Ecological suicide
We cannot condemn our children, and their children, to a future that is beyond their capacity to repair.  Not when we have the means -- the technological innovation and the scientific imagination -- to begin the work of repairing it right now. As one of America’s governors has said, “We are the first generation to feel the impact of climate change and the last generation that can do something about it.” So today, I’m here personally, as the leader of the world’s largest economy and its second largest emitter, to say that we have begun to do something about it.  Barack Obama’s Speech at U.N. Climate Change Summit September 23, 2014

The soil – is depleted of elements essential to our health, because of mono-cropping; it is also contaminated with pesticides and chemical fertilizers that have altered its chemical composition and are poisoning the groundwater from which we get our drinking water.

The oceans – are full of plastic microfibers discharged from our washing machines, since plastic has replaced natural fibres such as wool, cotton, linen and silk, along with heavy metals such as mercury are absorbed by the fish that we consume.

The air – is polluted by over emission of carbon dioxide gas that causes the greenhouse effect. This is responsible for the global warming that is melting the glaciers and polar ice caps; it is also causing sea levels to rise, changing wind patterns, changing the rhythm of seasons, and causing hurricanes, floods and droughts of unprecedented intensity.

The social environment – is also plagued by the fact that today the 1% of humanity has more wealth (54%) than the remaining 99% (46%). The gap between the rich and the poor never stops widening. Some die of hunger, and others die of abundance; if there was sharing, neither one nor the other would die.

Biodiversity – is another area of paramount importance. In addition to the fact that biodiversity protects humans from the effects of agricultural disasters, such as the Irish potato famine, the loss of one species results in significant changes in natural habitats that can seriously harm us in the short, medium or long run.

Death of the sun
Contrary to logic, the sun apparently is not producing less and less energy as it dies bit by bit. The more hydrogen is converted into helium, the more the sun's core shrinks, causing the outer layers to move closer to the centre under a stronger gravitational force. This causes more pressure on the core, accelerating hydrogen fusion and increasing energy production, leading to a 1% increase in luminosity every 100 million years. In the last 4.5 billion years, corresponding to the age of the sun, this energy has already grown by about 30%.

In one billion years, the sun will be 10% brighter than it is now. This increase in luminosity will lead to an increase in the heat and energy that Earth and its atmosphere will have to absorb, causing, in turn, an increase in the intensification of the greenhouse effect. This will gradually turn our planet into what Venus is presently: the hottest planet in the solar system with a temperature of around 500 degrees Celsius.

Within 3.5 billion years, the sun will be 40% brighter than it is today. Under this condition, seawater will boil and steam will be lost into space, turning our planet into a hot, dry planet like Venus. It will not have higher temperatures than Venus for the simple reason that Earth is farther from the sun.

When the sun's hydrogen is about to run out, the inert helium ash, the result of its combustion, will eventually collapse. This will cause the sun's core to become denser and hotter, increasing in size and entering the red giant phase.

In this phase, the orbits of Mercury and Venus will be absorbed by the growing sun, two thirds of our sky will be occupied by the sun which will gradually end up absorbing our planet. When this phase is reached, the sun will still have 120 million years of active life left. Finally, the accumulated helium will ignite violently, and in the next few hundred million years, it will burn the helium that resulted from the combustion of hydrogen.

The size of the sun will continue to increase until it turns into a white dwarf. In this state, it can still survive for trillions of years until it finally turns into a black hole.

The end of the universe
In 1927, the Belgian Catholic priest Georges Lamaître (pictured in the image illustrating this text), upon observing that the universe is expanding, intuited that it began when a very small and extremely dense point of matter exploded (the Big Bang). Atheists responded by claiming that after reaching its maximum expansion, Earth would initiate the reverse movement of contraction, ending in a great crunch and giving rise to the initial extremely dense point, which would then explode again and so on.

The observations and studies done so far have corroborated the Big Bang theory, but not the Big Crunch theory. The second law of thermodynamics tells us that the transformation of matter into energy is not possible without the irreversible breakdown of the first; there are no perfect machines that feed themselves, that is, that produce all the energy necessary for their own functioning.

The efficiency of a gasoline engine is about 25% and about 40% for a diesel engine; that is, we get more kilometers with one liter of diesel than one liter of gasoline; the efficiency of the steam machine is 12% and that of the human body is 1%. The universe is extremely inefficient and wastes its energy; in fact, it will expand until it dies, when it has used up all its nuclear energy.

The Bible is then correct in saying, "I am the Alpha and the Omega, the first and the last, the beginning and the end" (Revelation 22:13). Science therefore will never prove that our faith is wrong; on the contrary, the more man knows, the closer faith gets to reason and reason to faith.

Conclusion: Science, at last, discovers what faith has always known, that the universe had a beginning and will have an end. However, long before the universe, or the sun, runs out of energy, life on our planet can end in many other ways, some of those man-made.

Fr. Jorge Amaro, IMC

Profile of the 21st Century Missionary - Part 2

Rooted in tradition
A missionary is not a free entrepreneur; he belongs to a life community with which he is confronted, in the same way he confronts the Word of God that he strives to embody.

For a tree to be healthy, it must grow in two directions: both upwards and downwards. In this sense, the missionary is also confronted with a community formed by all those who, from the beginning and throughout the 2000 years, have lived in the apostolic faith, as for instance: the Church Fathers like Jerome, Augustine, Thomas Aquinas, Bonaventure, Teresa of Avila..., and in literature like Dante's Divine Comedy, masterpieces like Michelangelo's Sistine Chapel, music by Beethoven, Mozart, etc.

Today's missionary loves the tradition in which he is well planted, and sees himself as its continuator, like a runner in here and now of a relay race that began when Christ passed on his testimony to Peter and the apostles. This faith, which is essentially apostolic, is passed on from generation to generation, until the end of times, by the apostles of today, the missionaries.

We detach ourselves from the "sola fide sola gratia sola scriptura solus Christus" of Luther and his followers. First, because the Scripture or Word of God, as the written word, is subsequent to the Church, that is, to tradition. It is obvious that St. Paul's letters to the communities of Thessalonica, Ephesus, Corinth and Rome are subsequent to the constitution of these very communities: in other words, the address exists before the letter and not the other way around.

The gospels came after many of these letters and they are supposed to be the reflection of these same communities. Without the Church there would be no New Testament, just as without the people of Israel there would be no Old Testament.

Second, the dogmas such as Christ is truly man and truly God and the dogma of the Most Holy Trinity, accepted by all Protestants, are extra-biblical, they are the product of the Church’s reflection, that is, they belong to tradition. It makes no sense, to accept tradition up to a certain point in time and then to reject it on principle.

Lover of liturgy
(...) I saw the Lord sitting on a throne, high and lofty; and the hem of his robe filled the temple. Seraphs were in attendance above him; each had six wings: with two covered their feet, and with two they flew. And one called to another and said: ‘Holy, holy, holy is the Lord of hosts; the whole earth is full of his glory.’ The pivots on the thresholds shook at the voices of those who called, and the house filled with smoke.  Isaiah 6:1-4

The liturgy and the sacraments celebrate the faith and they are means to grow in faith. Without the liturgy and the sacraments, the people of God would not be a people because they would not gather. Without the Eucharist there is no Church, without the Church there is no Eucharist; only the mystical body of Christ which is the Church can celebrate the sacramental body of Christ.

In addition to celebrating and growing in faith, and forming the community, the liturgy and the sacraments are virtual encounters with God. The great prophet Isaiah found his vocation in a well celebrated liturgy where he felt God’s presence. It is the beauty of the temple where it is celebrated, the beauty of the ministers' vestments, the prayers, the singing, the music, the incense, the silence, the recollection as they all contribute to make our hearts vibrate and feel the presence of God like Isaiah had felt.

Chant your Magnificat
My soul magnifies the Lord, and my spirit rejoices in God my Saviour, for he has looked with favour on the lowliness of his servant. Surely, from now on all generations will call me blessed; for the Mighty One has done great things for me, and holy is his name... Luke 1:46-55

Being a missionary is, like Mary, to chant the Magnificat of the wonders that the Lord has worked in our lives, of how he has reprogrammed it, reoriented it, and given it a purpose. The Magnificat of Mary, like that of anyone who has experienced the presence of God active in his life, is a burst of joy; it is a "non plus ultra", the realization that God fills us to the brim, that "in him we live and move and have our being" (Acts 17:28).

The missionary, therefore, is not primarily the one who proclaims the gospel, nor the one who catechizes, or the one who speaks "objectively" of Jesus, of his history, life and miracles; that would be more proselytism than mission. The missionary does not speak "objectively" of Christ, but subjectively, because it is from his experiences and living in Christ that he proclaims the "evangelion", that is, the gospel.

Itinerant
For many evangelists nowadays, the norm is to live withdrawn from social life, confined to a narrow circle of Rectory-Church-Rectory, waiting for the people to hear the bell ringing and calling on the "sparrows to come to the nest", that is to the Church, and feeling frustrated when very few come.

For Jesus, the norm was to go out and experience the life of the people where this was taking place. Only once in a while, especially at night when the people were resting, would He also withdraw to enter into intimacy with His Father. Jesus was like a letter carrier who delivered to each person a personalized Good News and everyone found in Jesus the health-salvation they sought with faith.

Oftentimes the very same evangelist confines himself; at other times, it is the very same people of God that confines him, because they do not look kindly on his presence in certain settings. It is necessary to remind both sides that Jesus entered the houses of sinners, ate with them and lived with women, both reputable and otherwise, and he was not infected by their sins or way of life: on the contrary, all who came in contact with Him were positively influenced by his words, his deeds and way of life.

"Omnia munda mundis", to the pure, all things are pure. Just as for Jesus, for the present-day evangelist there must be no out of bound places. "Where the sun does not enter, the doctor does" – since the evangelist is, at the same time, the Sun and the doctor, if he does not enter as the sun, he enters as a doctor.

Jesus was itinerant, so were Paul, Francis of Assisi, Francis of Xavier, etc. The evangelists of today must also be itinerants. If Jehovah's Witnesses can manage to get proselytes with such a poor and deficient message, how much more could we achieve if we had their daring and zeal.

Jesus chose fishermen for his disciples, not shepherds. Fishermen have no sheep to take care of, they have nothing, they can have fish if they go out with their boats and catch them, as Peter and his brother Andrew did. To catch them, they need to mend their nets, like the sons of Zebedee did with their father, which is to say that today's missionary must be a person of prayer and ongoing formation.

Prayer is not time wasted that could have been spent on evangelization; on the contrary, through it and in it, the missionary purifies the word of God from the impurities that he himself places in it with his character, personality, prejudices, convictions and other beliefs.

In addition to prayer that puts the missionary in contact with the Lord of the Vineyard and the message that the evangelist proclaims, the missionary must also be a man of reflection. You can’t catch flies with vinegar, for each type of fish there is a type of net or hook or bait. The preacher does not preach in the same manner to children, young people and adults, in one culture or another; he must adapt the Word to those who hear it.

Lover of the new Media
The Internet is the sixth continent.  Pope Francis

With social media, the internet is no longer just the new encyclopedia of knowledge where everyone goes to do their research, but it is also a virtual meeting place in real time between peoples of different latitudes and longitudes, cultures, ethnicity and religions. From this virtual pulpit, the Word of God reaches more people and particular groups of people who, for one reason or another, do not attend the Church in person.

It is true that in this domain the Word of God contends with many other words; but, since there is no Good News that is more beautiful, more reasonable and more human than the gospel, one does not even need to be a great speaker to make it yield 100 fold when it is sown. (Cf. the parable of the Sower in Matthew 13: 1–9, 18–23)

Today's evangelist who neglects this new areopagus is not being faithful to the words of Jesus to "Go into all the world and proclaim the good news to the whole creation" (Mark 16:15).

Conclusion – Rooted in tradition, supported by a community, today's evangelist preaches in season and out of season, along the way and out of the way, in all the areopaguses, that is, in all the places where people gather.

Fr. Jorge Amaro, IMC

Profile of the 21st Century Missionary - Part-1

Having an intimate and personal relationship with Christ - We declare to you what was from the beginning, what we have heard, what we have seen with our eyes, what we have looked at and touched with our hands, concerning the word of life -- (…) -- we declare to you what we have seen and heard so that you also may have fellowship with us; and truly our fellowship is with the Father and with his Son Jesus Christ. 1 John 1:1,3

Theologian Karl Rahner said that the Christians of the future are either mystics or they are not Christians. To be a Christian is fundamentally to have an affective and effective relationship with Christ like the first Christians, his disciples; in fact, He chose them not primarily to be continuators of his work, but to live with him (Mark 3:14).

Christianity is therefore not a doctrine or philosophy of life; it is an affective relationship with Christ that leads to an affective relationship with all those around us. For today's Christian, as always, the affective must be effective, that is, it must change one’s life and give a sense of self fulfillment and joy to today’s Christian.

The main role of a missionary is to evangelize, not to catechize or do charity work, but to testify to the personal and intimate relationship of love that he has with the Lord and to offer that same experience to others. No one gives what he does not have; if we do not have this relationship, we cannot and should not be missionaries.

The evangelizer who announces the One with whom he does not have an intimate relationship is like a parrot; he talks about what he has learned and, instead of putting himself at the service of the Word, he puts the Word at his service, that is, he subliminally uses it to parade and promote himself.

Gift of the Word
The missionary must be what is known as a motivational speaker -- exciting, full of ardour and enthusiasm. A good communicator can sell even snake oil. Our product, the Word of God, has already proved its excellence and worth for more than two thousand years.

A Word of Life communicated without life disavows itself. We, more than anyone, have reasons to be joyful because we possess a faith that gives meaning to our existence here and now and launches us into the future, full of Hope, with nothing to fear.

Know the Bible
‘Therefore, every scribe who has been trained for the kingdom of heaven is like the master of a household who brings out of his treasure what is new and what is old.’ Matthew 13:52

 
The evangelizer of our time must be a good connoisseur of the Sacred Scripture. He must also be able to bring reality to the Scripture in order to find enlightenment, answers and solutions in it or bring Scripture to reality so that the Word of God is embodied in attitudes, behaviours and concrete actions.

Many Christian sects and the Copts in Ethiopia place the New alongside the Old, giving equal importance to one and the other. This is wrong because the New Testament, the New Covenant, cannot have the same value as the Old; if that were the case, we would not need the New. The New Covenant came to replace and fulfill the old one. The Old Testament must be read from the perspective of the New and to the extent that it agrees with the New Testament.

The Old Testament contextualizes the New, so one cannot understand the New Testament without understanding the Old; just as one cannot understand the Old Testament without knowing and understanding the history of the people of Israel.

Knowing our culture
Christianity begins with Christmas; the missionary is the one who brings birth to Christ, that is, he embodies the Word of God in every moment and in every place. To this end, he needs to possess a deep knowledge of the culture, the historical moment and the existential situation in which the people is living. He must have "the newspaper in one hand and the Bible in the other" as the great Protestant theologian Karl Barth used to say.

To embody the Word is to know how to find salvation in it for the "here and now" of a people; that is, the answer to the questions and the solution to the problems of the present moment. In this sense, the missionary is called to be a prophet, the man who knows how to read the signs of the times; "the man of the year", the natural leader, a Moses who can guide the people along the path of salvation, that is, of full spiritual, physical, mental and moral health.

Conclusion – As the bishop says at the ordination of a deacon as he hands him the Gospel, so should a missionary be today: "Receive the Gospel of Christ, which you have a mission to proclaim. Believe what you read, teach what you believe, and live what you teach".

Fr. Jorge Amaro, IMC

Rejecting the Church is rejecting Christ

Those who eat my flesh and drink my blood abide in me, and I in them. Just as the living Father sent me, and I live because of the Father, so whoever eats me will live because of me. (…) When many of his disciples heard it, they said, ‘This teaching is difficult; who can accept it?’ (…) Because of this many of his disciples turned back and no longer went about with him. John 6:56-57, 60, 66

It is the refusal of the Eucharist, not eating the body and blood of the Lord, that caused some followers to no longer accompanied Jesus, to no longer be his friends and his disciples.

Sadly, this is still the case today; whether or not one participates in the Sunday Eucharist distinguishes a practicing Catholic from a non-practicing one. Of the non-practicing Catholics, some think they can belong to the Church without participating in the Eucharist; others think they can reject the Church without rejecting Christ. Something like what many Protestants do in thinking that think they value Jesus more by taking away importance from Mary, his mother.

It is not possible to love Christ while hating the Church he founded. If Jesus of Nazareth is the historical Christ, the Church is the presence of Christ in history. Jesus said to Phillip: "I have been with you all this time, Phillip, and you still do not know me? Whoever has seen me has seen the Father. How can you say, “Show us the Father”? (John 14:9). If Christ represents God the Father, the Church represents Christ, whether well or not, she is his mystical body. This representation can be at times good or bad, close or far, but it is always a representation.

The Church, the Mystical Body of Christ - pluribus unum
Just as our body consists of about 37 trillion cells and each is a distinct unit with its particular role, they are all united in a single body because although they are many and very different, they have something in common:  their genetic code, their DNA.

In this same way, we Christians, who are more than a billion, are very different from each other. We live in different latitudes and longitudes, we speak different languages, we come from different human groups, cultures, nationalities, we have different idiosyncrasies and personalities, but we all have something in common: faith in our Lord Jesus Christ. This makes us one community, one body, one family.

Christ, in physical and human form, could only live and die once. However, the patent salvific action of his whole earthly life was not only for the men of his time and the place he lived, but for men of any time and place. The Church was founded by Him to extend His saving action to all times and places. The Church is Christ in time and space; the Church is Christ here and now. In Israel, two thousand years ago, Christ existed without his Church; after his life on earth, neither the Church exists without Christ nor Christ exists in time and space without his Church.

The Church, as the mystical body of Christ, inspired by the Holy Spirit, is the voice, the heart, the mind, and the hands and feet of the Lord in action here and now, in every time and place; it is the same saving action that Jesus performed from year zero to 33 AD in Israel.

Very truly, I tell you, the one who believes in me will also do the works that I do and, in fact, will do greater works than these, because I am going to the Father. John 14:12

The Eucharist, the sacramental body of Christ
A club, a company, an institution, a people that does not gather together cannot exist as such. The Eucharist, the sacramental body of Christ, is the reason why the mystical body of Christ gathers together. In the same place, the same Christ instituted the Eucharist and the Church, so that one does not exist without the other.

The day one ends, the other ends too. As before in the time of Jesus, the rejection of the Eucharist was the reason why they stopped walking with Him; in our times, this continues to be the reason. Whoever abandons the Eucharist, abandons the Church and vice versa. Whoever abandons the Church, abandons Christ and vice versa.

Many grains of wheat make one loaf of bread; many bunches of grapes make one bottle of wine; many Christians make one mystical body. Christ chose Bread and Wine to symbolize and signify his sacrifice for us; the Eucharist is the memorial of the Lord's life, passion, death and resurrection.

It is the Church that celebrates the Eucharist; the Eucharist is the Church’s reason for being, because it is the Eucharist that brings Christians together in response to the Lord's mandate, "Do this in memory of me" (Luke 22:19). The Eucharist gives the memory of the Lord and makes present the saving action of Christ. By participating in the Eucharist, we collect the fruits of redemption.

Christ is the body handed over and the blood shed for all mankind; Christ is the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world. Redemption is available to everyone, it is for everyone, those who take part in it are saved. God feeds the birds of the sky but He does not put the food in their nests, the birds have to get out and look for it in nature. Same thing with the Eucharist, it offers salvation to all, so come and get it.

So, Jesus said to them, ‘Very truly, I tell you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you. Those who eat my flesh and drink my blood have eternal life, and I will raise them up on the last day; for my flesh is true food and my blood is true drink.’ John 6:53-55

The Eucharist is the heart of the Church. In the human body, the function of the heart is to be the motor that moves blood from the cells to the heart and from the heart to the cells. In the same way, the life of the Christian is a shuttle between the Eucharist and the world. When the Mass was in Latin, at the end of it the priest would say "Ite missa est" which meant "you may go, the Mass is over", but it also meant "the Mass is over, the mission begins".

The Eucharist is to the Church and the Church to the Eucharist as the chicken is to the egg, and the egg to the chicken. In fact, both the Eucharist, born on Holy Thursday, and the Church, born on Pentecost, took place in the same Upper Room. The Eucharist was the moment of conception of the Church and Pentecost was the moment of her birth. The mystical body of Christ meets to celebrate the sacramental body of Christ and to communally feed on his body and blood, and his Word.

When one disappears the other disappears also. Therefore, he who being part of the mystical body of Christ that is the Church, ceases to participate in the Eucharist, he abandons the Church, and when there will no longer be people celebrating the Eucharist, there will no longer be a Church. The day the Eucharist ceases to be celebrated, that very same day the Church will also cease to exist.

If ever this happens, Christ dies in the history of humanity without ever resurrecting again, because it is the Church that preserves his memory and celebrates the Eucharist in his memory as He commanded (Luke 22:19). When there is no longer anyone in the world who celebrates the Eucharist in remembrance of Christ, He ceases to have on earth a physical body, the Church (his hands, feet, heart and mouth) to carry on the works of salvation, from one generation to the next.

I believe in the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church
Protestants do not understand how Catholics can include in the Creed, faith in the Church right after professing faith in God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit. We believe in the Church because she was founded by Christ and represents Christ, and through her, Christ makes his salvation present in the world even today. For all this, in her essence and through her founder, she is holy. By saying "I believe in the Church," I affirm that I believe in all that I have just said.

Saint and harlot, said a Catholic theologian. Yes, the Church is both holy and sinful. Holy in her essence because she was founded by Christ, sinful in her existence because she is constituted, since the beginning, by sinful men and women. If man, as St. Augustine defines him, is simul justus et peccator, at the same time just and sinful, so is the Church. But I don't reject her because she's my mother, no one rejects his mother because she has flaws.

Solus Christus, sola fide, sola scriptura
Luther's grave mistake was to throw away the Church. As we said earlier, today without the Church there is no Christ.

Solus Christus
It was Christ who founded the Church, this means that Luther rejects what Christ founded. It was Christ who gave life to the Church and still gives life to the Church, but it is also the Church that gives life to Christ because she represents Him here and now, because she makes real here and now the same thing that Christ made real during his time – it is for this that Christ founded the Church. Therefore, Christ gives life to the Church, and the Church gives life to Christ.

Sola fide
When the Son of Man comes, will he find faith on earth? Luke 18:8

It depends on the Church whether Christ will still find faith on earth when He returns to judge the living and the dead. It depends on her because it is she who passes on faith in Christ from generation to generation, like in a relay race the testimony is passed on.

This is because it is the Church that is the depository of faith in Christ. This is because our faith is apostolic, that is, the faith that Christ rose from the dead is apostolic because we believe in the testimony of the apostles: they saw, heard and touched the spiritual or glorious body of Christ. After them, no one else saw, touched, or heard Him as they saw, touched and heard Him (1 John 1:3). Just as today there is no Christ without the Church, nor Church without Christ, there is also no faith without the Church, nor Church without the faith.

Sola scriptura
The Christ we have is the Christ of the Church. It was she who gave birth to Christ for the world after his death and resurrection – if we think that the New Testament was written by Christian communities, it is Christ who holds the copyright. The group of apostles was already the Church, their preaching gave rise to new believers, and some of these faithful gathered in small Christian communities and wrote the gospels.

The apostles’ letters, especially Paul’s, were authentic letters because they had a sender, St. Paul, who addressed them to the small communities in Corinth, Ephesus, Thessalonica, etc. Therefore, as far as the New Testament is concerned, there is no scripture without the Church.

Unus christianus nullus christianus - St. Augustine, the founder of the religious order of which Luther was a member, said, "one Christian, no Christian." Christianity was born into community and can only be lived in community. Without community, there is no Christianity. As all animals have a habitat where they live and thrive, so a Christian can only live and thrive within the Christian community.

Conclusion – Whoever ceases to participate in the Eucharist, abandons the Church, and whoever rejects the Church rejects the One who founded her as His mystical body, for she represents Christ in the here and now of history, from generation to generation. As He said, “the gates of hell will not prevail against it” (Matthew 16:18) because “I am with you always, to the end of the age” (Matthew 28:20).

Fr. Jorge Amaro, IMC

Christ and the Religions of the World

The idea that all religions are equal and worth the same is widespread today; for non-believers, they are all bad; for believers, they are all good as they all lead to salvation, each one can choose the one that suits him the best or the one that culturally best adapts to his idiosyncrasy.

It is true that every culture has its own particular way of conceptualizing and worshipping God. We see this even within a single religion like Christianity. In Europe, where it emerged and flourished, the East became Orthodox and the West remained Catholic for a while until the rupture. Afterwards, the North became Protestant and the South remained Catholic.

However, today with the increasing globalization of cultures, differences or nuances in living and acting have become small, because of the one human nature that does not vary in time or space. Proof of this, and for the topic that occupies us, we can organize all religions, present or past, into three major categories: animists, polytheists and monotheists.

This is possible because since there is only one human nature invariable in time and space, there is also only one model of development. In other words, there is no alternative model of development to the one we have today, which involves the discovery of electricity, the automotive movement, the discovery of the printing press, the radio, the television, the internet, etc.

Evolution of religious sentiment
As soon as the human being became aware of himself, it was as if he had awakened from a great dream, and when he looked at the reality that surrounded him, the first belief he had was that everything around him was also aware of itself, that each had a spirit, an anima. This is how animism emerged as the first stage in the evolution of religious sentiment.

Animism
A bit like magic, animism is based on the belief that the world, both in its entirety and in its parts, has a soul or spirit; even the air we breathe is populated by spirits that are impersonal forces that can be invoked or summoned and manipulated by shamans, mediums, magicians, sorcerers or witches using formulas, rituals and magic spells.

Despite it being only the first stage of the evolution of religious sentiment, it is still practised today by indigenous tribes where these still exist: in both North and South America, Asia, Africa, Australia and the Pacific Islands.

Furthermore, in the modern world, all forms of superstition and divination, such as astrology, cartomancy, witchcraft, sorcery, are remnants of animism that have a huge popular acceptance. Objects that bring good luck and objects that bring bad luck, rituals that conjure good luck and rituals to avoid bad luck, continue to be part of our daily life such as entering with the right foot, believing in the power of rabbit’s foot, four-leaf clover, horseshoe ...

The New Age religion, which pretends to be the synthesis of all religions, has much of Neo-paganism or animism. If we wish, even the Franciscan spirituality can be seen from this perspective, in calling the wolf and the sun brothers, and the water and the moon sisters, St. Francis was giving back to these realities the soul they once possessed.

After the rain of materialism that has been increasingly falling since the Renaissance, today most people realize that a material object cannot have spiritual power. Only a spiritual being has spiritual power. However, there are still those who are superstitious, always reminding us of the animism of our ancestors.

If we compare the evolution of the notion of God with the maturation of man, animism corresponds to childhood - children do indeed have the tendency to see everything around them as having a soul, they talk to their dolls and toys, they live in an animated world of fairies, witches and boogeymen, and they believe in Santa Claus and magic; Walt Disney, in his films for children, knew well how to explore this side of childhood fantasy.

Polytheism
As the human being comes to know and therefore dominate his environment, the latter becomes materialized. All the realities that the human being knows, controls and dominates lose their soul and the power they have over him. The one who knows, exercises his power and control over the known reality. In this way the realm of the spiritual world outside the person is reduced.

There are, however, certain realities that the human being does not master with knowledge, where he still feels powerless and helpless, where he is at their mercy, these realities he calls them gods. Thus arises a god for each reality that the human being does not master: the god of war, Mars; the god of the sea, Neptune; the goddess of love, Venus, etc.

Monotheism
The prehistory of monotheism takes place when the human being groups all these gods and gives them a leader – Zeus in Greek mythology, and Jupiter in Roman mythology; they are the father of other gods. The first human being to proclaim that there is only one god was a pharaoh from Egypt named Akhenaten, also known as Amenhotep IV, who reigned in Egypt in 14th century AC. The idea did not take hold among the Egyptians of that time, but was embraced years later by a people, in slavery in the land of Egypt – the Jewish people.

The discovery of the Hebrew people, in this sense, is that of a personal God who concentrates within himself all human aspirations, whatever that is good and perfect. Since the Jews were nomads, and nomads cannot have local gods, and as they move from place to place, it would be very cumbersome to carry their idols around, they then thought of a concrete reality that was everywhere. They looked up and found him in heaven.

Sedentary peoples tend to be polytheistic; nomadic peoples, on the other hand, are monotheistic. The Turkans, a nomadic people of northern Kenya, have the same word to designate Heaven and God. The Mongols, Turks and Tatars worshipped a common god called Tengri, the god of blue sky.

Christianity is no longer a religion, but God’s revelation
Long ago God spoke to our ancestors in many and various ways by the prophets, but in these last days he has spoken to us by a Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, through whom he also created the worlds.  Hebrews 1:1-2

It is true that all religions worship the same God and aim to humanize man. For this reason, the Church no longer presents herself to the world as the only plank of salvation and recognizes in all religions "semina verbum", fragmented pieces of truth. There is, therefore, salvation without the Church, but there can be no salvation without Christ, because he being God made man, is the fullness of truth and therefore valid for all times and all places.

Like the Old Testament prophets, the founders of all religions were the revealers of God's will and the longings of the peoples at a certain point in their history, leading them along the right path.

Christ, more than a prophet or the right man for a concrete moment, is the right man for all times and all places. He did not come to evangelize the Jewish people so that they would be faithful to their faith, nor did he come to purify the faith of the Jewish people. True, he was born among the Jewish people, but he did not come only for the Jewish people; as the prophet Isaiah prophesied so well, Christ came for all peoples.

Religion designates all the effort human beings have made over time to attract God’s blessing, through sacrifices, rituals and liturgies. Religion is, therefore, an initiative of the human race. Revelation is a divine initiative; it is no longer man making his way to God, but God making His way to man. You did not choose me but I chose you. (John 15:16)

Since Christ is no longer just a prophet, so in relation to the other religions, Christianity makes a qualitative leap and, in this way, all religions are to Christianity what the Old Testament of the Bible is to the New Testament.

At the individual level
“No one goes to the Father except through me”, Jesus said in (John 14: 6-14), and “whoever knows me knows the Father (John 14:7)," which is equivalent to saying that whoever does not know me does not know the Father. "I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life (John 14:6)" which is equivalent to saying that there is no alternative way, truth, and life. Whoever does not gather with me scatters, he also said.

At the social level
Jesus of Nazareth knows that new men make new societies, and new societies through education, make new men, so it is necessary to act on both levels. Christianity is not like Buddhism which only aims at individual personal perfection and is disinterested in others, nor like Judaism that only aims at the salvation of the Jewish people and the condemnation of the rest non-Jewish pagans.

On this mountain the Lord of hosts will make for all peoples a feast of rich food, a feast of well-matured wines, of rich food filled with marrow, of well-matured wines strained clear. Isaiah 25:6

Christ came with a project for all peoples, the Kingdom of God, as was foretold rightly by the prophet Isaiah in the banquet for all peoples. Later, Jesus explains in parables what the kingdom of God is, where he often uses the image of a banquet open to all (Matthew 22, 1-14).

Christianity is a social revolution and an individual psychotherapy
Then the Lord said, ‘I have observed the misery of my people who are in Egypt; I have heard their cry on account of their taskmasters. Indeed, I know their sufferings, and I have come down to deliver them from the Egyptians, and to bring them up out of that land to a good and broad land, a land flowing with milk and honey...  Exodus 3: 7-8

Jesus, as the new Moses, comes to take human beings out of all forms of slavery, he comes to offer himself as the role model to emulate so that man can be truly free. Since Christ, God made man, incarnated in life the most perfect model of humanity, He is the reference of all human beings; everyone who seeks and strives to be an authentic person, whatever his creed or religion, without having to profess the Christian faith, it is to Christ that he must compare himself and not to anyone else.

Jesus enters human history like a meteorite in the middle of the sea and makes waves in the form of concentric circles, from the centre to the farthest shores. Since it was a meteorite that ended the reign of the great reptiles, the dinosaurs, giving way to small mammals from which the human race evolved, so Christ is the King of the Universe who comes to re-establish his kingdom on earth that He, with the Father and the Holy Spirit, had created.

Inspired further with the metaphor of the meteorite that makes concentric circles with its fall, Christ bursts into the middle of human history dividing it into two periods: before his coming and after his coming, his birth being year zero.

Whether it is because Christians form the largest group, or because the Western culture of Christian matrix has become universalized because it is more advanced, the fact is that no matter how much the Jews, atheists and agnostics prefer to call it the Common Era instead, the birth of Christ is still year zero from which human history is counted backwards and forwards.

Christ is the cornerstone (Acts 4:11) of salvation history. He came to save both the living and the dead, that is, all who lived before him (Ephesians 4:9-10), having even thought (John 20:24-29) and prayed for those who would live after him (John 17:20).

Because He, fundamentally, did not come to found a new religion, but rather to teach man to be man, and how to relate to others, in order to make the world a better place, transforming it into the kingdom of God, that is, into a society where justice and peace reign.

I was hungry, thirsty, a stranger, naked, in prison or in the hospital, and you gave me or did not give me assistance... (Matthew 25:31-46). At the final judgment, which is same for all peoples, we will not be asked what religion we belonged to, what we were, the success we had in our lives or how many religious practices we carried out. The judgment is not religious at all because it does not contain questions of a religious nature, but exclusively of a social nature.

From the time God took on human nature, all human beings have become ipso facto his brothers and sisters. There is no longer anyone in this world who is all alone, who has no one to defend him, Jesus remains hidden in each one of us, especially in the poorest and the most disadvantaged. Through this final judgment, we learn that the assistance we provided or did not provide to those who crossed our path during our lives, it was to Him that we provided or did not provide.  

On the other hand, no atheist or agnostic would deny that there is no human life without love and that to live is to love. In which case, Jesus has only one commandment that says just that: to love God above all things, above yourself and about everything, to love yourself as God loves you and to love others as you love yourself. What's so religious about this? Interpreting this commandment, St. Augustine goes so far as to say: Ama et fac quod vis or love and do whatever you will...

Conclusion – All religions before Christ are like "Old Testaments"; Christ is the New Testament to all of them. There is salvation outside the Church, but there is no salvation outside of Christ, for He is the only Way, Truth, and Life to God the Father; as He himself said that no one goes to the Father except through me. (John 14:6)

Fr. Jorge Amaro, IMC

Fugitives, Wanderers, or Pilgrims?

Leaving bits and pieces of one’s life around the world... Camões

Coordinates of human life
The human being is a spatiotemporal being. He occupies a space for a time, so that, as it happens in the universe and nature that surround and involve us, there is nothing stationary or permanent about human life. We cannot stand still in time or in space: life implies movement, a process, a becoming, a path, a change.

By the way we use and situate ourselves in time or relate to it, we can be fugitives or vagabonds; the gospel, however, exhorts us to be pilgrims.

Life is wide, but short. It is wide in possibilities, in the many and diverse ways of using our time, but it is short in length. Therefore, there is nothing worse than to think we have to kill time because we have too much time on our hands. This is not true, so there is no time to kill nor time to lose, because the reality is that time is scarce.

Fugitives, vagabonds and pilgrims have in common the fact that they are not attached to people, things, or places. They are never stationary at one place, but easily move from place to place. Therefore, they also have in common the way they settle in time and how they live the present moment. But they differ in how they relate to the other two times of human life: the past and the future.

The pilgrim lives well the three dimensions of time, while the fugitive lives bound hand and foot to the past and fears the future. The penniless vagabond has no past, no present and no future, he lives suspended in time like a reed shaken by the wind.

Human time is three-dimensional: past – present – future
The three times in which life takes place are interactive: neither the past has passed completely nor all of the future is yet to come.  The two times exist in the present and interact with it. As such, the present does not always refer solely to the present, it can refer also to the past as well as the future. Just as the past and the future visit the present, the present can also move into the future and the past. The present in itself is what is occurring, but when we think about what is occurring, it is already in the past.

The past has passed, but is never gone; the future arrives, but is never fully here, it moves forward like a carrot tangling in front of the donkey’s snout. As long as we exist, all three times exist with us and we will only stop having a present and a past when we stop having a future, that is, when we die. Since all three live together, all three also die together, just a few seconds apart. We die from front to back: first the future dies, then the present and only then the past.  

We are like an arrow that someone has shot in the past. According to life’s circumstances, we can have some control over the direction the arrow takes, but we know that "all roads lead to Rome", that fate is common, that death is both certain and uncertain. Certain because it is the only thing we know for sure about our future, as Heidegger says, we are a being made for death. Uncertain because we do not know how or when we are going to die, and I don't think anyone is interested in knowing.

In case there is eternal life, as we Christians certainly believe, then the future dies and so does the past, because they cease to be interactive in the present. Life made up of ticking time ceases to be a reality. What we were, we are. What we are today is a contribution of both the good and the bad of our lives. All events in our past served as the scaffolding for the building construction. When construction is over, with our death, the scaffolding is no longer needed: what we turned out to be is now what we will be forever in eternity.

Our physical body also belongs to the category of scaffolding, because through it and with it we build our being, our spiritual body, and when it is built, time ceases in its dimension of future and past, and remains in its dimension of present, an eternal present in God and with God.

To live is to leave
People whose mother tongue is English can distinctively pronounce these two verbs without any effort; foreigners, however, tend to pronounce them the same way. The fact that I used to pronounce them in the same way led me to discover an intrinsic relationship between them.

To live means and implies to leave, to let go of the place where we are and go to another. The pilgrimage is printed in us already at the chromosomal and cellular level. If the tubules within the testes where sperm cells are produced were straightened, the total length would extend about 70 centimeters.

The X or Y sperm cell that gave us life passed through these tubules, and when ejaculated travelled further through our mother’s reproductive system until it united with its other half cell in the Fallopian tube and formed a new being. There the conception took place; but four days later, the new being had to leave this place in order to travel and live in the uterus where it nestled for nine months until it completed its growth.

At birth, the baby leaves his mother’s womb and enters the bosom of a family where he is loved unconditionally. As such, this becomes the second maternal womb until the day when he has to go to school where he is no longer loved unconditionally. The first day of school is tough. I recall how I used to keep my eyes fixed on my mother until I turned the corner at the end of the street as I left my home to go to school.

Just when primary school becomes familiar, it is time to leave to go to high school; for me it was the seminary. On the first day, my father took me there, but when he left, the world came crashing down for me... and I cried bitterly.... Some of us leave our family to form another family, some of us leave our land to seek employment in another.

Immigrants leave their land in order to seek a better future for themselves and their families. To leave the principle of pleasure for the principle of reality; to leave father and mother to join with his wife; to leave everything to follow the master. Those who do not leave, like the rich young man, do not find life.

In time we are fugitives, vagabonds or pilgrims
As temporal beings, our life takes place within the three dimensions of time:  past, present and future. Depending on their age, people tend to favour one dimension over the other two.

Children and young people – Setting the past aside, they live the present as a preparation for a future they dream of and in which they project themselves. Because the future may never come, each day must be worth its own weight, not detached from the future, of course, but not lived entirely in function of it either.  The advice then is to live the present in charity.

Elderly – When objectively there is not much left to hope for, they live on memories. The memory of past happiness does not give joy but sadness. It is true that life is better understood by looking back, but it is lived forward. Even in old age, Christian hope tells us that the best is yet to come, therefore what can be done must be done. The advice then is to live the future not in anxiety, but in hope.

Adults – They live installed in the present, they do not care about the past or the future. In fact, they live as if they would never die. They do anything to stop time and the damage it causes in their life: the plastic surgeries to maintain a youthful appearance when they are no longer young, overly concerned or not concerned at all about exercising, diets, health, that is, too focused on themselves. The advice then is to integrate both the past and the future of one’s life so to live the present in charity and not looking in the mirror or at one’s umbilical.

Fugitives
And the LORD said, ‘What have you done? Listen; your brother’s blood is crying out to me from the ground! And now you are cursed from the ground, which has opened its mouth to receive your brother’s blood from your hand. When you till the ground, it will no longer yield to you, its strength; you will be a fugitive and a wanderer on the earth.’ Genesis 4:10-12

God said to Cain that because he killed his brother, he will be a fugitive on earth. The fugitive is haunted by remorse for something he did in the past. On the run from the police, he has no present or future. What goes around comes around or here they do, here they pay... Cain is a fugitive because he is running away from a past that haunts him in the present. His path is determined by his persecutors, not by him; therefore, he has no present and no future. He is trapped by something he did in the past that is always present in the form of remorse, so much so that it denies him a life.

Hunted by one’s past is an expression that denotes well the circumstances the fugitive lives in. Like a hunted prey, he lives life in fear of being caught. The unresolved issue of the past haunts him in the present. Passed waters do not move mills, and yet many people, contradicting this law of nature, have their mills or heads moved by past waters, because they have not apologized or forgiven, or because they were traumatized or abused and they repress or pretend that nothing happened.

"Have you ever forgiven the Nazis for all that they did to us when we were prisoners in Auschwitz?” a former prisoner asked his friend after many years without seeing each other. The friend replied, “I haven’t and I never will forgive those bastards!” “Oh yeah? " Replied the former, “then you’re still there, in Auschwitz."

The one who does not forgive lives in the past, he seeks to escape from this past that always haunts him and which negatively determines his present. He deludes himself, thinking that the past has stayed in the past, but the truth is that what we know and assume of our past is redeemed and, as such, we can control. What we do not know and do not assume or forgive of our past, precisely because it is repressed and outside of our day-to-day consciousness, controls us, bursting forth into our present in a thousand and one ways. In projecting the ghosts of the past into the present, we may think that we are fighting our enemies, when objectively we are fighting windmills, like Don Quixote de la Mancha.

Whoever does not owe, does not fear; the fugitive does owe and therefore, he fears, he distrusts everything, everyone including himself. He lives anchored in the past that has traumatized him and continues to reproduce in the present that past; in other words, he lives in a prison.  The one who has been abused will be an abuser, the point is to abuse without getting caught; thieves only consider themselves as such if they are caught. Those who have skeletons in their closet never live feeling safe.

Vagabonds
The vagabond in time corresponds to the tourist in space. We come from nothing, we go to nothing; in this way, life has no meaning; therefore, the agnostic and the atheist are fundamentally vagabonds. Nowadays, there are homeless people who are so by choice, philosophers who want this type of life, who do not commit to anything or anybody, not even to their own survival.

Carpe diem became the motto of life for many people after the popular 1989 movie, the “Dead Poets Society". The vagabond lives in the present, but not the conscious and omniscient present of Eastern philosophies, but rather in a consumerist, hedonistic and unconscious present:  die Martha, die fed up. Without caring about the past that has been and the future that is not yet and may not be, the vagabond walks in the vicious circle of an eternal return. “For those who do not know where to go, there are no favourable winds”.

I don't make promises lest I fail, something we hear so often. The vagabond promises nothing to no one, nor commits to anything or anyone, because that would mean counting on the future. But the vagabond doesn't know the word future; he lives in the moment and for the moment. In relation to the past and the future he has the attitude of an ostrich that sticks its head in the sand, he represses and denies its existence.   He prefers not to think and therefore he abstracts himself, using diversion or work like a drug to avoid thinking and confronting himself.

He has no past nor future, he lives installed in the world as if he is from the world. He lives as if he will never die and dies as if he had never lived (Dalai Lama). With a divorce rate in Portugal greater than 70%, many do not want to make long term commitment since it is seen as mortgaging the future, as limiting one’s freedom.

The young people want to have their options open and therefore, they live installed at the roundabout or the crossroads of life.  Since they never choose a route, they are like hamsters running on rotating wheels, never going anywhere. Because choosing one route means saying no to all the others. But if you spend your life without committing yourself to anything or anyone, you are like a car with its engine on but going nowhere.

To live is to choose a path to go somewhere, not to go in circles; it is always to leave Egypt to cross the desert, in the hope of entering the Promised Land. For this, we need a guide; but the vagabonds, since they are going nowhere, they do not need a guide, do not accept advice from anyone. For those who do not know where to go, there are no favourable winds.

Pilgrims
Happy are those whose strength is in you, in whose heart are the highways to Zion. As they go through the valley of Baca they make it a place of springs; the early rain also covers it with pools. They go from strength to strength; the God of gods will be seen in Zion. Psalm 84:5-7

In the prehistory of our faith there has been countless pilgrimages: Abraham, the wandering Aramean who only possessed a grave that he bought for his wife, left his city in Mesopotamia to go to Canaan; the Hebrew people from Egypt, the land of slavery to the promised land of freedom and prosperity; the journeys to Jerusalem for the Passover.

After Christ, there have been Christian pilgrimages to the Holy Land, Rome and Santiago de Compostela; in the Orthodox tradition, the Russian pilgrimage; already in our times, pilgrimages to Guadalupe in Mexico, Lourdes in France, Fatima in Portugal, Czestochowa in Poland; pilgrimage is a very important Christian practice because, in some way, it is a parable of life. To live is to make pilgrimages, a Christian must behave towards the world around him and his fellow men like a pilgrim.

A pilgrimage is a metaphor or parable of how human life should be lived. Abraham, our father in faith, was a wandering Aramean; the Hebrew people, by leaving Egypt, crossing the desert towards the Promised Land where milk and honey flowed abundantly, established the paradigm of human life.
•    Karl Marx – capitalism, dictatorship of the proletariat, classless society
•    Mandela – Apartheid, 30-something years in jail, president of a society of equals
•    Addiction – cleanliness, withdrawal syndrome, freedom

Unlike the fugitive, the pilgrim lives reconciled with his past, so he does not depend on it; unlike the vagabond, he has a goal that he intends to attain, so he lives the present moment with intensity, always knowing who he is, where he comes from and where he is going, he is never bewildered or disoriented, because his life is regulated as if he had a GPS.

The biblical man – In the Hebrew language the word "Nikud" means both future and backs; on the other hand, the word "Quedem" means both past and east/the direction of the rising sun. Therefore, we can conclude that the biblical man has the past in front of him and the future behind his back, that is, he walks with his chest and face turned to the past, with his back to the future.

With our eyes on the past because that is where our roots, our being, our identity are, we live moving towards the future, but we understand our life by looking at our past and through the past we orient ourselves toward the future. We know little or nothing about the future, which is why we walk backwards, that is, blindly; the only thing we know for certain in our future is death, but even then, we do not know how or when or where it will occur. For the pilgrim to remember is not to live; that is why he looks to the past not to relive it, but to orient himself, using in the present what he has learned from the experiences of the past, to find the best way to the future.

There is no evil that always lasts nor good that always endures – The pilgrim knows that life is made up of ups and downs, like the line of an electroencephalogram or electrocardiogram, he knows that on the way to God he can find both heaven and hell, but he also knows that everything is fleeting, so when he is on a high, he does not lose his head, and when he is depressed, he does not lose hope. At every moment and every place, he lives under the Lord’s protection, and therefore, he is constant, patient and faithful.

Conclusion - The Pilgrim is not like the fugitive because, he has no regrets, he is not tied to his past. Nor is he like the vagabond, because he lives committed in the present, in giving himself to a cause and to concrete people with the same intensity, as if it were his last day.

Contrary to the #Fugitive, tied to a past from which he flees, or the #Wanderer, uncommitted to the present, living without a future, the #Pilgrim is proud of his past, walks to the future with hope and fills his present with charitable deeds.  

Fr. Jorge Amaro, IMC